Literature DB >> 9699406

Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.

L Pizzoni1, G Ravnholt, B Melsen.   

Abstract

Orthodontic tooth movement can be regarded as teeth sliding on a wire like pearls on a string, the force being supplied by springs or elastics. The movement implies friction between wire and bracket, taking up part of the force and leaving an uncontrolled amount to act on the teeth. The friction is likely to depend on bracket construction and wire material. Therefore, in this investigation the friction of self-ligating brackets and beta-titanium wires was evaluated, as opposed to more conventional configurations. Carried by low-friction linear ball bearings, a bracket was made to slide along an out-stretched archwire with minimal (and known) basic friction, either parallel or at an angle to the wire. Two self-ligating brackets were used in their closed position without any normal force. Friction was tested against four wires: stainless steel and beta-titanium, both in round and rectangular cross-sections. The force used to overcome friction and to move the bracket was measured on a testing machine at 10 mm/min, and the basic friction was subtracted. The results show that round wires had a lower friction than rectangular wires, the beta-titanium wires had a markedly higher friction than stainless steel wires, and friction increased with angulation for all bracket/wire combinations. The self-ligating brackets had a markedly lower friction than conventional brackets at all angulations, and self-ligating brackets, closed by the capping of a conventional design, exhibited a significantly lower friction than self-ligating brackets closed by a spring. The selection of bracket design, wire material, and wire cross-section significantly influences the forces acting in a continuous arch system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699406     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  41 in total

1.  A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type.

Authors:  Souk Min Lee; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

3.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evaluation of friction in orthodontics using various brackets and archwire combinations-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar; Shamsher Singh; Rani Hamsa P R; Sameer Ahmed; Apoorva Bhatnagar; Manreet Sidhu; Pramod Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

5.  Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.

Authors:  W Perrey; A Konermann; L Keilig; S Reimann; A Jäger; C Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 6.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  A comparative evaluation of rate of space closure after extraction using E-chain and stretched modules in bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion cases.

Authors:  Rajat Mitra; S M Londhe; Prasanna Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

8.  The leveling effectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex tooth malalignments.

Authors:  Magali Fansa; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Corrosion behavior of self-ligating and conventional metal brackets.

Authors:  Lúcio Henrique Esmeraldo Gurgel Maia; Hibernon Lopes Filho; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Mônica Tirre de Souza Araújo; Delmo Santiago Vaitsman
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

10.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.