Literature DB >> 9698344

Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus.

E A Murray1, M Mishkin.   

Abstract

Earlier work indicated that combined but not separate removal of the amygdala and hippocampus, together with the cortex underlying these structures, leads to a severe impairment in visual recognition. More recent work, however, has shown that removal of the rhinal cortex, a region subjacent to the amygdala and rostral hippocampus, yields nearly the same impairment as the original removal. This raises the possibility that the earlier results were attributable to combined damage to the rostral and caudal portions of the rhinal cortex rather than to the combined amygdala and hippocampal removal. To test this possibility, we trained rhesus monkeys on delayed nonmatching-to-sample, a measure of visual recognition, gave them selective lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus made with the excitotoxin ibotenic acid, and then assessed their recognition abilities by using increasingly longer delays and list lengths, including delays as long as 40 min. Postoperatively, monkeys with the combined amygdala and hippocampal lesions performed as well as intact controls at every stage of testing. The same monkeys also were unimpaired relative to controls on an analogous test of spatial memory, delayed nonmatching-to-location. It is unlikely that unintended sparing of target structures can account for the lack of impairment; there was a significant positive correlation between the percentage of damage to the hippocampus and scores on portions of the recognition performance test, suggesting that, paradoxically, the greater the hippocampal damage, the better the recognition. The results show that, within the medial temporal lobe, the rhinal cortex is both necessary and sufficient for visual recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9698344      PMCID: PMC6793180     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

1.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. I. Temporal lobe afferents.

Authors:  G Van Hoesen; D N Pandya
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-09-12       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Anterior rhinal cortex and amygdala: dissociation of their contributions to memory and food preference in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  E A Murray; E A Gaffan; R W Flint
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Hippocampal lesions and path integration.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; J E McKenna; H Maaswinkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  A comparison of the efferents of the amygdala and the hippocampal formation in the rhesus monkey: I. Convergence in the entorhinal, prorhinal, and perirhinal cortices.

Authors:  R C Saunders; D L Rosene
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-05-08       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys.

Authors:  L Málková; M Mishkin; J Bachevalier
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Hippocampectomized monkeys can remember one place but not two.

Authors:  S J Angeli; E A Murray; M Mishkin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Stimulus recognition.

Authors:  M Mishkin; E A Murray
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Environmental knowledge is subserved by separable dorsal/ventral neural areas.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J P Aggleton; M J Burton; R E Passingham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities.

Authors:  W A Suzuki; S Zola-Morgan; L R Squire; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  103 in total

1.  Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation.

Authors:  P A Dudchenko; E R Wood; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region.

Authors:  S M Zola; L R Squire; E Teng; L Stefanacci; E A Buffalo; R E Clark
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in the hippocampal region during recognition memory.

Authors:  C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage.

Authors:  E Düzel; F Vargha-Khadem; H J Heinze; M Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recognition memory correlates of hippocampal theta cells.

Authors:  S P Wiebe; U V Staubli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Task relevance enhances early transient and late slow-wave activity of distributed cortical sources.

Authors:  C J Aine; J M Stephen; R Christner; D Hudson; E Best
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories.

Authors:  Lila Davachi; Jason P Mitchell; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Evidence concerning how neurons of the perirhinal cortex may effect familiarity discrimination.

Authors:  M W Brown; Z I Bashir
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Against memory systems.

Authors:  David Gaffan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Norbert J Fortin; Sean P Wright; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.