Literature DB >> 9694186

Why do GPs perform investigations?: The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays.

P Little1, T Cantrell, L Roberts, J Chapman, J Langridge, R Pickering.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the most important medical and psychosocial reasons GPs report for requesting back X-rays.
METHODS: All GPs in a single health district were mailed a questionnaire and asked to document their reasons for requesting back X-rays.
RESULTS: A total of 166/236 (70%) of GPs responded. There were 445 comments (mean 2.7 per doctor): 319 (72%) were medical indications (mean 1.9 per doctor) and 126 (28%) psychosocial reasons (mean 0.8 per doctor). GPs' medical criteria for requesting back X-rays were mainly in line with current guidelines. The most common psychosocial reasons were patient satisfaction (17%), work related (14%) and reassurance (8%).
CONCLUSION: GPs' reported medical criteria for arranging back X-rays are mainly 'appropriate', but psychosocial reasons-especially patient satisfaction and reassurance-are also likely to be important factors. If psycho-social agendas are important in ordering investigations, then clinical guidelines which discuss only medical criteria may not be effective in reducing 'inappropriate' investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9694186     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.3.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  20 in total

1.  Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation.

Authors:  R Buchbinder; D Jolley; M Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

2.  Primary care referrals for lumbar spine radiography: diagnostic yield and clinical guidelines.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Christopher J Todd; Hugh King; Tony Males; Adrian K Dixon; Kanti R Karia; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Severe herpes zoster after infliximab infusion.

Authors:  A Kinder; S Stephens; N Mortimer; P Sheldon
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  The new contract: renaissance or requiem for general practice?

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Reasons for ordering spinal x-ray investigations: how they influence general practitioners' management.

Authors:  P H H Houben; T der van Weijden; J Sijbrandij; R P T M Grol; R A Winkens
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Darryl T Gray; Brook I Martin; Sean D Sullivan; Richard A Deyo; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Resource utilisation, length of hospital stay, and pattern of investigation during acute medical hospital admission.

Authors:  R McMullan; B Silke; K Bennett; S Callachand
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Radiography for low back pain: a randomised controlled trial and observational study in primary care.

Authors:  Sally Kerry; Sean Hilton; Derek Dundas; Elizabeth Rink; Pippa Oakeshott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists' perceptions.

Authors:  Kristin B Lysdahl; Bjørn M Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.