Literature DB >> 17279187

Reasons for ordering spinal x-ray investigations: how they influence general practitioners' management.

P H H Houben1, T der van Weijden, J Sijbrandij, R P T M Grol, R A Winkens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether general practitioners who request spinal x-ray investigations are less likely to refer, prescribe medication, or order additional tests when they intend only to reassure patients rather than to exclude or confirm disease.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. Physicians recorded reasons for requesting x-ray examinations and differential diagnoses on the request form. When they received a radiologist's report on a spinal x-ray test, GPs also received a questionnaire on their subsequent management.
SETTING: Maastricht region of the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: All 90 GPs in the Maastricht region who referred patients for spinal x-ray examinations during 19 consecutive weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reason for requesting spinal x-ray investigations, results, and subsequent management.
RESULTS: We received completed questionnaires on 386 patient contacts. Physicians were significantly less likely to refer, prescribe medication, or order additional tests when they intended only to reassure patients rather than to exclude or confirm disease (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.6). This effect was independent of the results of the x-ray examinations.
CONCLUSION: Physicians seem to be aware that they have requested spinal x-ray examinations only to reassure patients, and they account for this in their management. These findings support debate on the negative consequences of requesting tests for other than purely medical reasons. Concerns about unjustified actions based on the results of x-ray examinations that were requested primarily to reassure patients should probably have only a minor role in the debate about unnecessary testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17279187      PMCID: PMC1783593     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  16 in total

Review 1.  Problems in interpreting laboratory tests. What do unexpected results mean?

Authors:  M L Brigden; J C Heathcote
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  The effect of radiology guidelines for general practitioners in Plymouth.

Authors:  P de vos Meiring; I P Wells
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Why do GPs perform investigations?: The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays.

Authors:  P Little; T Cantrell; L Roberts; J Chapman; J Langridge; R Pickering
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Influence of Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on referral from general practice. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-09

5.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Patients' views on importance and usefulness of plain radiography for low back pain.

Authors:  A Espeland; A Baerheim; G Albrektsen; K Korsbrekke; J L Larsen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Radiographic examination of the lumbar spine in a community hospital: an audit of current practice.

Authors:  S F Halpin; L Yeoman; D D Dundas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-05

8.  A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. II. Radiographic findings.

Authors:  D P Symmons; A M van Hemert; J P Vandenbroucke; H A Valkenburg
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  GPs' and physicians' interpretation of risks, benefits and diagnostic test results.

Authors:  Richard F Heller; John E Sandars; Lesley Patterson; Patrick McElduff
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice.

Authors:  Trudy van der Weijden; Marloes A van Bokhoven; Geert-Jan Dinant; Cathelijne M van Hasselt; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Implementation Study for Spinal Disorders: A Randomized Trial with Postal Follow-ups.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Louis Laurencelle; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.