Literature DB >> 9694138

Analysis of early outcome: Burch procedure versus pubovaginal sling.

S P Marinkovic1, S Marinkovic, H Mian, M Evankovich, D Poplawsky, J Novi, C Frey, W Yap.   

Abstract

The Burch vesicourethral suspension (BUVS) has long been the procedure of choice for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) because of its low complication rate and high success rate for all but those patients with type 3 SUI. The pubovaginal sling (PVS) procedure yields a high success rate in those with type 3 SUI but has not gained wide use for all types of SUI, owing to initial reports of a higher complication rate. A retrospective review of early effectiveness and complications associated with BUVS performed on 36 women without type 3 SUI compared to that for PVS performed on 42 women (24 with and 18 without type 3 SUI) at our institution was carried out. To ensure reasonable comparability between groups, homogeneous subsets of 18 women undergoing BUVS and 18 women undergoing PVS were defined. Using conservative criteria for early complications, PVS patients experienced half the complications of BUVS patients with a comparable rate of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9694138     DOI: 10.1007/bf01982216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  19 in total

1.  A simplified surgical procedure for the correction of stress incontinence in women.

Authors:  A J PEREYRA
Journal:  West J Surg Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1959 Jul-Aug

2.  Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper's ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse.

Authors:  J C BURCH
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1961-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Pitfalls of urodynamic testing.

Authors:  P D O'Donnell
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of complicated stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J G Blaivas; B Z Jacobs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of three different surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  A Bergman; C A Ballard; P P Koonings
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Correlation of the cystoscopic appearance and functional integrity of the female urethral sphincteric mechanism.

Authors:  F E Govier; T R Pritchett; J D Kornman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Predicting intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  N S Horbach; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function.

Authors:  E J McGuire; C C Fitzpatrick; J Wan; D Bloom; J Sanvordenker; M Ritchey; E A Gormley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Modified Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in females.

Authors:  P Kiilholma; J Mäkinen; M B Chancellor; Y Pitkänen; T Hirvonen
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-02

10.  Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence.

Authors:  E J Mcguire; B Lytton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.