Literature DB >> 2017808

Pitfalls of urodynamic testing.

P D O'Donnell1.   

Abstract

Urodynamic studies are one of the most useful clinical techniques available for the evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Urodynamic data are of immense value in the diagnosis and treatment of many disorders of bladder and urethral function. However, there are problems of measurement that can limit the clinical applications of information obtained. First, the urologist should have a special interest in the neurophysiology of lower urinary tract disorders. Second, the standardized ICS concepts and terminology should be used in the descriptions of the findings. Third, the clinical value and limitations of each segment of the studies should be appreciated by the urologist. Fourth, careful attention should be given to the testing methodology and the calibration of the instruments. Finally, an investigative scientific approach should be taken to the interpretation of the data obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  2 in total

1.  Analysis of early outcome: Burch procedure versus pubovaginal sling.

Authors:  S P Marinkovic; S Marinkovic; H Mian; M Evankovich; D Poplawsky; J Novi; C Frey; W Yap
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

Review 2.  A comparison of external transducers and microtransducers in urodynamic studies of female patients.

Authors:  Peter M Lotze
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.862

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.