Literature DB >> 9693395

New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.

J Trussell1, G Rodríguez, C Ellertson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide new estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception and to offer correctly computed estimates of the confidence intervals for estimated effectiveness rates. Through a literature search, seven studies that present the number of women treated and outcome of treatment by cycle day of unprotected intercourse relative to expected day of ovulation were identified. Probabilities of conception by cycle day of intercourse among women not using contraception and the associated variance-covariance matrix from five other datasets were estimated, and these external estimates were used to assess the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen. The 40 estimates of effectiveness, based on seven separate studies and the seven studies combined and five different sets of conception probabilities by cycle day, ranged from a low of 44.2% to a high of 88.7%. The preferred point estimate is that emergency contraceptive pills reduce the risk of pregnancy by 75.4%, with a 95% confidence interval extending from 65.6% to 82.4%. True effectiveness is likely to be at least 75% because treatment failures (observed pregnancies) include women who were already pregnant when treated and women who became pregnant after being treated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Postcoital; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Estimation Technics; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postcoital; Literature Review; Research Methodology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9693395     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00042-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Modeling the cost and outcomes of pharmacist-prescribed emergency contraception.

Authors:  K D Marciante; J S Gardner; D L Veenstra; S D Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  How safe is emergency contraception?

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charlotte Ellertson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Thoughts for the future.

Authors:  M O Tanira
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2000-01

4.  Emergency contraception: Knowledge and practice among women and the spouses seeking termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  S K Kathpalia
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-14

5.  Emergency contraception: is it time to change method?

Authors:  A Webb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-06

Review 6.  Ulipristal acetate: a review of its use in emergency contraception.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Jamie D Croxtall
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Safety and effectiveness data for emergency contraceptive pills among women with obesity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mitchell D Creinin; William Schlaff; David F Archer; Livia Wan; Ron Frezieres; Michael Thomas; Michael Rosenberg; James Higgins
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Emergency contraception: potential role of ulipristal acetate.

Authors:  Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Chun-Xia Meng
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 10.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.