Literature DB >> 21568368

Ulipristal acetate: a review of its use in emergency contraception.

Kate McKeage1, Jamie D Croxtall.   

Abstract

Ulipristal acetate (ellaOne®; ella®) is the first of a new class of selective progesterone receptor modulators, and is indicated for emergency contraception within 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse or contraceptive failure. The principal effect of ulipristal acetate is to inhibit or delay ovulation. This effect may result from the drug's ability to delay the onset of luteinizing hormone (LH) surge or postpone LH peak if LH surge has started, or possibly by a direct inhibitory effect on follicular rupture, when administered in the follicular phase (including just before ovulation). In clinical trials, a single oral dose of ulipristal acetate 30 mg was effective in preventing pregnancies in women requesting emergency contraception after unprotected sexual intercourse and provided sustained efficacy throughout the 120-hour postcoital period in which it is indicated. When compared with levonorgestrel in well designed noninferiority trials, it was no less effective in preventing pregnancies when administered within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse, but was more effective when administered later (within 72-120 hours). Results of a meta-analysis suggest that ulipristal acetate may be more effective than levonorgestrel from day 1 and throughout the entire 5-day period following unprotected sexual intercourse. Ulipristal acetate is generally well tolerated, with a similar tolerability profile to that of levonorgestrel. In general, the onset of menses is delayed by 2-3 days following treatment. Although, ulipristal acetate is more expensive than levonorgestrel, it may represent a cost-effective alternative to levonorgestrel for women requesting emergency contraception within 120 hours of unprotected intercourse. Thus, ulipristal acetate provides effective, sustained and well tolerated emergency contraception when taken within 120 hours of unprotected sexual intercourse, thereby offering an extended treatment window compared with levonorgestrel, which should be administered within 72 hours.
© 2011 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568368     DOI: 10.2165/11207410-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  22 in total

Review 1.  FFPRHC Guidance (April 2006). Emergency contraception.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2006-04

2.  New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.

Authors:  J Trussell; G Rodríguez; C Ellertson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  CDB-4124 and its putative monodemethylated metabolite, CDB-4453, are potent antiprogestins with reduced antiglucocorticoid activity: in vitro comparison to mifepristone and CDB-2914.

Authors:  Barbara J Attardi; Janet Burgenson; Sheri A Hild; Jerry R Reel; Richard P Blye
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2002-02-25       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  A novel pathway involving progesterone receptor, endothelin-2, and endothelin receptor B controls ovulation in mice.

Authors:  Gopinath S Palanisamy; Yong-Pil Cheon; Jaeyeon Kim; Athilakshmi Kannan; Quanxi Li; Marcey Sato; Srinivasa R Mantena; Regine L Sitruk-Ware; Milan K Bagchi; Indrani C Bagchi
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-08-03

5.  Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna F Glasier; Sharon T Cameron; Paul M Fine; Susan J S Logan; William Casale; Jennifer Van Horn; Laszlo Sogor; Diana L Blithe; Bruno Scherrer; Henri Mathe; Amelie Jaspart; Andre Ulmann; Erin Gainer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Emergency contraception: past, present and future.

Authors:  M Cremer; R Masch
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2010-08

7.  Is it worth paying more for emergency hormonal contraception? The cost-effectiveness of ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel 1.5 mg.

Authors:  Christine M Thomas; Ramona Schmid; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2010-10

8.  Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Ulipristal acetate taken 48-120 hours after intercourse for emergency contraception.

Authors:  Paul Fine; Henri Mathé; Savita Ginde; Vanessa Cullins; Johanna Morfesis; Erin Gainer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Interventions for emergency contraception.

Authors:  L Cheng; A M Gülmezoglu; G Piaggio; E Ezcurra; P F A Van Look
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Ulipristal acetate: in uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Jamie D Croxtall
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Immunopharmacology of ulipristal as an emergency contraceptive.

Authors:  Ralph P Miech
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-11-22

3.  Glucose and fatty acid metabolism involved in the protective effect of metformin against ulipristal-induced endometrial changes in rats.

Authors:  Marwa S Hamza; Eman Ramadan; Salama A Salama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.