Literature DB >> 9693258

Effect of a continuous gamma irradiation at a very low dose on the life span of mice.

A Caratero1, M Courtade, L Bonnet, H Planel, C Caratero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is epidemiological evidence that suggests there are beneficial effects of ionizing radiation at low doses. Some experimental studies confirmed this hormetic effect with doses of about 1 cGy/day, but no data concerning very low dose rates are available.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the life span of mice exposed to very low doses of ionizing radiation.
METHODS: Six hundred female C57BL/6 mice, 1 month old, were exposed to chronic gamma irradiation at very low dose rates of 7 or 14 cGy/year. These doses are about 25 or 50 times higher than background, but much lower than the doses of about 1 cGy/day used in previous experiments. Three hundred mice living in the same room were used as controls.
RESULTS: The life span, after the beginning of the experiment, determined by the survival time of 50% of each population, is increased in irradiated mice: 549 days in controls, 673 days in both irradiated groups. The differences are significant between the control and the irradiation mice. Differences between mice irradiated with 7 or 14 cGy are not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the possibility of a nonharmful effect (hormesis) of ionizing radiation. They demonstrate that the paradigm, which states that low-dose effects can be predicted high-dose effects, cannot be systematically applied in radiation biology in general and gerontology in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9693258     DOI: 10.1159/000022024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  19 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Hormetics: dietary triggers of an adaptive stress response.

Authors:  Marc Birringer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Suhny Abbara; Marcus Y Chen; Ralph Gentry; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

5.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Immunological mechanism of the low-dose radiation-induced suppression of cancer metastases in a mouse model.

Authors:  Ewa M Nowosielska; Aneta Cheda; Jolanta Wrembel-Wargocka; Marek K Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Ionizing radiation and aging: rejuvenating an old idea.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  The hormetic effects of hypergravity on longevity and aging.

Authors:  Nadège Minois
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9.  A dose of experimental hormesis: When mild stress protects and improves animal performance.

Authors:  Raymond Berry; Giancarlo López-Martínez
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.320

10.  Effect of low doses of low-let radiation on the innate anti-tumor reactions in radioresistant and radiosensitive mice.

Authors:  Ewa M Nowosielska; Aneta Cheda; Jolanta Wrembel-Wargocka; Marek K Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.