Literature DB >> 9692945

Thermodynamic stability of archaeal histones.

W T Li1, R A Grayling, K Sandman, S Edmondson, J W Shriver, J N Reeve.   

Abstract

The temperature, salt, and pH dependencies of unfolding of four recombinant (r) archaeal histones (rHFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, and rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHPyA1 from the hyperthermophiles Methanothermus fervidus and Pyrococcus strain GB-3a) have been determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The thermal unfolding of these proteins is > 90% reversible, with concentration-dependent apparent Tm values and asymmetric unfolding transitions that are fit well by a two-state unfolding model in which a histone dimer unfolds to two random coil monomers. rHPyA1 dimers are stable in the absence of salt, whereas rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHFoB dimers unfold at 20 degrees C and pH 2 in solutions containing < 200 mM, < 400 mM, and < 1.5 M KCl, respectively. rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHFoB also experience significant cold denaturation in low salt concentrations and at low pH. The midpoint of thermal unfolding of a 1 M protein solution (T degree value) and the temperature dependency of the free energy of unfolding have been established for each histone, and both parameters correlate with the growth temperature of the originating archaeon. The changes in heat capacity upon unfolding are similar for the four histones, indicating that enhanced thermostability is not obtained by altering the curvature of the stability curve. Rather, the stability curves for the histones from the hyperthermophiles are displaced vertically to higher energies and laterally to higher Tmax values relative to the stability curve for rHFoB. The maximal free energies of unfolding for rHFoB, rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHPyA1 are 7.2, 15.5, 14.6, and 17.2 kcal/mol at 32, 35, 40, and 44 degrees C, respectively. T degree values for rHFoB, rHMfA, rHMfB, and rHPyA1 are 75, 104, 113, and 114 degrees C, respectively, at pH 5 in 0.2 M KCl. Structural features within the conserved histone fold that might confer these stability differences are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9692945     DOI: 10.1021/bi973006i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hyperthermophilic enzymes: sources, uses, and molecular mechanisms for thermostability.

Authors:  C Vieille; G J Zeikus
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Observation of the noncovalent assembly and disassembly pathways of the chaperone complex MtGimC by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M Fändrich; M A Tito; M R Leroux; A A Rostom; F U Hartl; C M Dobson; C V Robinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Toward the physical basis of thermophilic proteins: linking of enriched polar interactions and reduced heat capacity of unfolding.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Role of residual structure in the unfolded state of a thermophilic protein.

Authors:  Srebrenka Robic; Mercedes Guzman-Casado; Jose M Sanchez-Ruiz; Susan Marqusee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The impact of solubility and electrostatics on fibril formation by the H3 and H4 histones.

Authors:  Traci B Topping; Lisa M Gloss
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Thermal adaptation of viruses and bacteria.

Authors:  Peiqiu Chen; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Mutational analysis of differences in thermostability between histones from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea.

Authors:  W T Li; J W Shriver; J N Reeve
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Lessons in stability from thermophilic proteins.

Authors:  Abbas Razvi; J Martin Scholtz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Experimental evidence for the role of domain swapping in the evolution of the histone fold.

Authors:  Michalis Hadjithomas; Evangelos N Moudrianakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Slow unfolding of monomeric proteins from hyperthermophiles with reversible unfolding.

Authors:  Atsushi Mukaiyama; Kazufumi Takano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.