Literature DB >> 9691482

Detection of chromatic and luminance contrast modulation by the visual system.

S J Cropper1.   

Abstract

The data presented in this paper examine the ability of observers to detect a modulation in the contrast of chromatic and luminance gratings as a function of the carrier contrast, duration, and spatial frequency. The nature of the signal underlying this ability is investigated by examining both the paradigm used to make the measurement and the effect of grating masks on performance in the tasks. The results show that observers' ability to discriminate amplitude modulation from an unmodulated carrier is dependent on carrier contrast but only up to approximately 5-8 times carrier-detection threshold. Discrimination is, however, independent of spatial frequency [10-1 cycles per degree (cpd) component-frequency range], carrier color, and, most surprisingly, stimulus duration (1000-30 ms). This set of experiments compliments data from previous papers and assimilates many of the conclusions drawn from this previous data. There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of a distortion product mediating performance under any of the current conditions, and the data seriously question whether the visual system might use such a signal even if it does exist under more extreme conditions than those used here. The evidence suggests that the visual system detects variations in both chromatic and luminance contrast by means of a mechanism operating locally upon the spatial structure of the carrier.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9691482     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.15.001969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  4 in total

1.  Flexibility of spatial averaging in visual perception.

Authors:  Tania Lombrozo; Jeff Judson; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Responses to second-order texture modulations undergo surround suppression.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Contrast detection in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  F Farzin; D Whitney; R J Hagerman; S M Rivera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatio-chromatic contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic light levels.

Authors:  Sophie Wuerger; Maliha Ashraf; Minjung Kim; Jasna Martinovic; María Pérez-Ortiz; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.