Literature DB >> 9691048

Efficient repair of all types of single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Competition between long-patch and G-T glycosylase-mediated repair of G-T mismatches.

C A Bill1, W A Duran, N R Miselis, J A Nickoloff.   

Abstract

Repair of all 12 single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates was investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Extrachromosomal recombination was stimulated by double-strand breaks in regions of shared homology. Recombination was predicted to occur via single-strand annealing, yielding heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) with a single mismatch. Nicks were expected on opposite strands flanking hDNA, equidistant from the mismatch. Unlike studies of covalently closed artificial hDNA substrates, all mismatches were efficiently repaired, consistent with a nick-driven repair process. The average repair efficiency for all mispairs was 92%, with no significant differences among mispairs. There was significant strand-independent repair of G-T --> G-C, with a slightly greater bias in a CpG context. Repair of C-A was also biased (toward C-G), but no A-C --> G-C bias was found, a possible sequence context effect. No other mismatches showed evidence of biased repair, but among hetero-mismatches, the trend was toward retention of C or G vs. A or T. Repair of both T-T and G-T mismatches was much less efficient in mismatch repair-deficient cells (approximately 25%), and the residual G-T repair was completely biased toward G-C. Our data indicate that single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates are substrates for at least two competing repair systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9691048      PMCID: PMC1460289     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  67 in total

1.  Intermolecular homologous recombination between transfected sequences in mammalian cells is primarily nonconservative.

Authors:  M M Seidman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Extrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells as studied with single- and double-stranded DNA substrates.

Authors:  F L Lin; K M Sperle; N L Sternberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Mutation in the DNA mismatch repair gene homologue hMLH1 is associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer.

Authors:  C E Bronner; S M Baker; P T Morrison; G Warren; L G Smith; M K Lescoe; M Kane; C Earabino; J Lipford; A Lindblom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Some features of base pair mismatch repair and its role in the formation of genetic recombinants.

Authors:  M S Fox; J P Radicella; K Yamamoto
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1994-03-15

5.  Efficient removal of uracil from G.U mispairs by the mismatch-specific thymine DNA glycosylase from HeLa cells.

Authors:  P Neddermann; J Jiricny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  DNA loop repair by human cell extracts.

Authors:  A Umar; J C Boyer; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A specific mismatch repair event protects mammalian cells from loss of 5-methylcytosine.

Authors:  T C Brown; J Jiricny
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Differential mismatch repair can explain the disproportionalities between physical distances and recombination frequencies of cyc1 mutations in yeast.

Authors:  C W Moore; D M Hampsey; J F Ernst; F Sherman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Characterization of a mammalian homolog of the Escherichia coli MutY mismatch repair protein.

Authors:  J P McGoldrick; Y C Yeh; M Solomon; J M Essigmann; A L Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The mutY gene: a mutator locus in Escherichia coli that generates G.C----T.A transversions.

Authors:  Y Nghiem; M Cabrera; C G Cupples; J H Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  17 in total

1.  Suppression of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells by small degrees of sequence divergence.

Authors:  T Lukacsovich; A S Waldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Measurement of DNA mismatch repair activity in live cells.

Authors:  Xiufen Lei; Yong Zhu; Alan Tomkinson; LuZhe Sun
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  GC content evolution of the human and mouse genomes: insights from the study of processed pseudogenes in regions of different recombination rates.

Authors:  Adel Khelifi; Julien Meunier; Laurent Duret; Dominique Mouchiroud
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Evolution of gene sequence in response to chromosomal location.

Authors:  Carlos Díaz-Castillo; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The correlation between recombination rate and dinucleotide bias in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Guoqing Liu; Hong Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Cytosine Methylation Affects the Mutability of Neighboring Nucleotides in Germline and Soma.

Authors:  Vassili Kusmartsev; Magdalena Drożdż; Benjamin Schuster-Böckler; Tobias Warnecke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mechanisms of recombination between diverged sequences in wild-type and BLM-deficient mouse and human cells.

Authors:  Jeannine R Larocque; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Identifying concerted evolution and gene conversion in mammalian gene pairs lasting over 100 million years.

Authors:  Andrew R Carson; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  GC-biased gene conversion in yeast is specifically associated with crossovers: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary significance.

Authors:  Yann Lesecque; Dominique Mouchiroud; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.