PURPOSE: To estimate gamma-ray doses received by Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors using electron spin resonance (ESR) of tooth enamel and to compare the results with cytogenetic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tooth enamel ESR was performed for 100 teeth donated from 69 Hiroshima survivors, and conventional cytogenetic examinations were conducted for 61 of the tooth donors. To evaluate possible contamination from dental X-ray exposure, which primarily affects the tooth's buccal surface, each tooth was divided into buccal and lingual parts for subsequent independent enamel isolation and ESR measurement. RESULTS: Almost 20 teeth showed considerably larger buccal doses than lingual doses, but most of these discrepant teeth were incisors and canines. The results are probably attributable to solar light exposure. In contrast, the buccal and lingual doses found in molars were similar. Conventional translocation data of lymphocytes and ESR-estimated doses of 40 donors of molars showed the dose-response for translocations to be almost the same as that expected from in vitro gamma-ray irradiation experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Both tooth enamel ESR and lymphocyte cytogenetics are useful measures for individual biodosimetry of acute radiation exposure, even half a century after the exposure occurred.
PURPOSE: To estimate gamma-ray doses received by Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors using electron spin resonance (ESR) of tooth enamel and to compare the results with cytogenetic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tooth enamel ESR was performed for 100 teeth donated from 69 Hiroshima survivors, and conventional cytogenetic examinations were conducted for 61 of the tooth donors. To evaluate possible contamination from dental X-ray exposure, which primarily affects the tooth's buccal surface, each tooth was divided into buccal and lingual parts for subsequent independent enamel isolation and ESR measurement. RESULTS: Almost 20 teeth showed considerably larger buccal doses than lingual doses, but most of these discrepant teeth were incisors and canines. The results are probably attributable to solar light exposure. In contrast, the buccal and lingual doses found in molars were similar. Conventional translocation data of lymphocytes and ESR-estimated doses of 40 donors of molars showed the dose-response for translocations to be almost the same as that expected from in vitro gamma-ray irradiation experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Both tooth enamel ESR and lymphocyte cytogenetics are useful measures for individual biodosimetry of acute radiation exposure, even half a century after the exposure occurred.
Authors: Harold M Swartz; Greg Burke; M Coey; Eugene Demidenko; Ruhong Dong; Oleg Grinberg; James Hilton; Akinori Iwasaki; Piotr Lesniewski; Maciej Kmiec; Kai-Ming Lo; R Javier Nicolalde; Andres Ruuge; Yasuko Sakata; Artur Sucheta; Tadeusz Walczak; Benjamin B Williams; Chad Mitchell; Alex Romanyukha; David A Schauer Journal: Radiat Meas Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 1.898
Authors: Alexander I Ivannikov; Artem M Khailov; Sergey P Orlenko; Valeri G Skvortsov; Valeri F Stepanenko; Kassym Sh Zhumadilov; Benjamin B Williams; Ann B Flood; Harold M Swartz Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Ildar Salikhov; Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Kevin Rychert; Gaixin Du; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Evan B Douple; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Harry M Cullings; Dale L Preston; Kazunori Kodama; Yukiko Shimizu; Saeko Fujiwara; Roy E Shore Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Roberto Javier Nicolalde; Paul Calderon; Gaixin Du; Benjamin B Williams; Masaichi-Chang-Il Lee; Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Robert M Gougelet; Michael E Rea; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams Journal: Health Phys Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Steven G Swarts; Xiaoming He; Oleg Grinberg; Jason Sidabras; Eugene Demidenko; Jiang Gui; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis; Maciej M Kmiec; Kyo Kobayashi; Piotr N Lesniewski; Stephen D P Marsh; Thomas P Matthews; Roberto J Nicolalde; Patrick M Pennington; Timothy Raynolds; Ildar Salikhov; Dean E Wilcox; Bassem I Zaki Journal: Health Phys Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 1.316