BACKGROUND: We recently reported an association between increased bone strontium (Sr) levels and osteomalacia in dialysis patients. METHODS: To delineate whether or not Sr acts as a causal factor in the development of osteomalacia, we devised the following study: four groups of chronic renal failure (CRF) rats were given Sr, aluminum (Al), both of these compounds or none of the elements (controls). RESULTS: Administration of Sr and/or A1 resulted in increased bone levels of the respective elements. Histological examination revealed impairment of mineralization in the Sr group and to a lesser extent in the Al group as compared to the control group. There was also a significant increase in osteoid area in the Sr group, but not in the Al group. No differences in bone surface or erodic perimeter were noted between the various study groups. Histochemically, Sr could be localized in calcified bone, mainly in new bone close to the osteoid/calcification front, a critical site of bone mineralization. Histochemical findings were confirmed by electron probe X-ray microanalysis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that Sr accumulation in chronic renal failure rats resulted in the development of osteomalacic lesions, in contrast to the Al group where adynamic bone disease was induced in the present set-up. Further studies are required to define the mechanism by which way Sr causes osteomalacia in chronic renal failure rats.
BACKGROUND: We recently reported an association between increased bone strontium (Sr) levels and osteomalacia in dialysis patients. METHODS: To delineate whether or not Sr acts as a causal factor in the development of osteomalacia, we devised the following study: four groups of chronic renal failure (CRF) rats were given Sr, aluminum (Al), both of these compounds or none of the elements (controls). RESULTS: Administration of Sr and/or A1 resulted in increased bone levels of the respective elements. Histological examination revealed impairment of mineralization in the Sr group and to a lesser extent in the Al group as compared to the control group. There was also a significant increase in osteoid area in the Sr group, but not in the Al group. No differences in bone surface or erodic perimeter were noted between the various study groups. Histochemically, Sr could be localized in calcified bone, mainly in new bone close to the osteoid/calcification front, a critical site of bone mineralization. Histochemical findings were confirmed by electron probe X-ray microanalysis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that Sr accumulation in chronic renal failurerats resulted in the development of osteomalacic lesions, in contrast to the Al group where adynamic bone disease was induced in the present set-up. Further studies are required to define the mechanism by which way Sr causes osteomalacia in chronic renal failurerats.
Authors: Paola Llinas; Michel Masella; Torgny Stigbrand; André Ménez; Enrico A Stura; Marie Hélène Le Du Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Jan Philippe Kretzer; Ulrike Mueller; Marcus R Streit; Hartmuth Kiefer; Robert Sonntag; Robert M Streicher; Joern Reinders Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Ali Alenezi; Silvia Galli; Saba Atefyekta; Martin Andersson; Ann Wennerberg Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 3.896