Literature DB >> 9689507

A new HF current generator with automatically controlled system (Endocut mode) for endoscopic sphincterotomy--preliminary experience.

A Kohler1, M Maier, C Benz, W R Martin, G Farin, J F Riemann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The main complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy are pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis. In a prospective randomized trial, a conventional current generator was compared to a new generator with an automatically controlled cut system (Endocut) for sphincterotomy. The purpose was to establish whether the new device reduces the complication rate of sphincterotomy. Our experiences over the last 2 years with the new HF current generator are described here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study 100 patients were randomly assigned to one of the two generators. The following points were documented in a protocol form: abrupt or continuous cutting; length of papillotomy; complications.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sex, age or indication for sphincterotomy. Nor were there any significant differences in the length of the sphincterotomy or mild pancreatitis. In contrast, an abrupt opening of the papillary roof was more frequently observed with the conventional generator (18 patients) than with the new device (one patient, P < 0.001). Mild bleeding occurred in two patients with the new unit, but in 13 with the conventional unit (P = 0.002). Moderate or severe bleeds were observed in neither of the two groups. During the subsequent application phase lasting for 2 years, the following complications occurred in a total number of 850 sphincterotomies (EST): pancreatitis 2.8% (one patient died); hemorrhages requiring transfusion 1% (n = 8); concealed perforations 0.3% (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience to date and based on this study, this new HF surgery unit enables performance of controlled, bloodless sphincterotomies. The danger of papillary hemorrhage appears to be reduced. All examiners found the new system to be safer and more convenient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9689507     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1001281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic complications--avoidance and management.

Authors:  Daniel Blero; Jacques Devière
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Supportive techniques and devices for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Sakurazawa; Shunji Kato; Itsuo Fujita; Yoshikazu Kanazawa; Hiroyuki Onodera; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

3.  Safety advantage of endocut mode over endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Hirotada Akiho; Yorinobu Sumida; Kazuya Akahoshi; Atsuhiko Murata; Jiro Ouchi; Yasuaki Motomura; Taisuke Toyomasu; Mitsuhide Kimura; Masaru Kubokawa; Masahiro Matsumoto; Shingo Endo; Kazuhiko Nakamura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Fukatsu; Hirofumi Kawamoto; Ryo Harada; Koichiro Tsutsumi; Masakuni Fujii; Hironari Kato; Ken Hirao; Takashi Nakanishi; Osamu Mizuno; Tsuneyoshi Ogawa; Etsuji Ishida; Hiroyuki Okada; Kohsaku Sakaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endocut Versus Conventional Blended Electrosurgical Current for Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Complications.

Authors:  De-Feng Li; Mei-Feng Yang; Xin Chang; Nan-Nan Wang; Fang-Fang Tan; Hai-Na Xie; Xue Fang; Shu-Ling Wang; Wei Fan; Jian-Yao Wang; Zhi-Chao Yu; Cheng Wei; Feng Xiong; Ting-Ting Liu; Ming-Han Luo; Li-Sheng Wang; Zhao-Shen Li; Jun Yao; Yu Bai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Submerging endoscopic submucosal dissection leads to successful en bloc resection of colonic laterally spreading tumor with submucosal fat.

Authors:  Satoshi Ono; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Osamu Goto; Shinya Kodashima; Masao Omata
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: A technical review.

Authors:  Noriaki Matsui; Kazuya Akahoshi; Kazuhiko Nakamura; Eikichi Ihara; Hiroto Kita
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-16

8.  [Burns by electric scalpel blade: four cases].

Authors:  A Khales; A Achbouk; R Belmir; L Cherkab; M A Ennouhi; K Ababou; H Ihrai
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2010-09-30

9.  Is there a safer electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis?

Authors:  Erkan Parlak; Aydın Şeref Köksal; Erkin Öztaş; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Bülent Ödemiş; Mahmut Yüksel; Hakan Yıldız; Nurgül Şaşmaz; Burhan Şahin
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Prophylactic submucosal saline-adrenaline injection in colonoscopic polypectomy: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  S Dobrowolski; M Dobosz; A Babicki; D Dymecki; S Hać
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.