Literature DB >> 16610062

Safety advantage of endocut mode over endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Hirotada Akiho1, Yorinobu Sumida, Kazuya Akahoshi, Atsuhiko Murata, Jiro Ouchi, Yasuaki Motomura, Taisuke Toyomasu, Mitsuhide Kimura, Masaru Kubokawa, Masahiro Matsumoto, Shingo Endo, Kazuhiko Nakamura.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate whether an automatically controlled cut system (endocut mode) could reduce the complication rate of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and serum hyperamylasemia after EST compared to the conventional blended cut mode.
METHODS: From January 2001 to October 2003, 134 patients with choledocholithiasis were assigned to either endocut mode group or conventional blended cut mode group at the time of sphincterotomy. The two groups were retrospectively compared for the complications after EST and serum amylase level before and 24 h after the procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 134 patients treated, 79 were assigned to conventional blended cut mode group and 55 to endocut mode group. There was no significant difference in age, sex, and serum amylase level before EST between the two groups. Complications were found in 5 patients of the endocut mode group (9%): hyperamylasemia (5 times higher than normal) in 4 and moderate pancreatitis in 1. Complications were found in 13 patients of the conventional blended cut mode group (16%): hyperamylasemia in 12 and moderate pancreatitis in 1. Serum amylase levels were elevated in both groups 24 h after EST (P<0.02). The average serum amylase level 24 h after EST in the conventional blended cut mode group was significantly higher than that in the endocut mode group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Endocut mode offers a safety advantage over conventional blended cut mode for pancreatitis after EST by reducing hyperamylasemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16610062      PMCID: PMC4087690          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i13.2086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the whole truth.

Authors:  M E Lambert; C D Betts; J Hill; E B Faragher; D F Martin; D E Tweedle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention.

Authors:  K Huibregtse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Pain at 24 hours associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times the upper normal limit as the most reliable indicator of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  P A Testoni; F Bagnolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M L Freeman; D B Nelson; S Sherman; G B Haber; M E Herman; P J Dorsher; J P Moore; M B Fennerty; M E Ryan; M J Shaw; J D Lande; A M Pheley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blended current.

Authors:  G H Elta; J L Barnett; R T Wille; K A Brown; W D Chey; J M Scheiman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  A new HF current generator with automatically controlled system (Endocut mode) for endoscopic sphincterotomy--preliminary experience.

Authors:  A Kohler; M Maier; C Benz; W R Martin; G Farin; J F Riemann
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.093

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Endocut Versus Conventional Blended Electrosurgical Current for Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Complications.

Authors:  De-Feng Li; Mei-Feng Yang; Xin Chang; Nan-Nan Wang; Fang-Fang Tan; Hai-Na Xie; Xue Fang; Shu-Ling Wang; Wei Fan; Jian-Yao Wang; Zhi-Chao Yu; Cheng Wei; Feng Xiong; Ting-Ting Liu; Ming-Han Luo; Li-Sheng Wang; Zhao-Shen Li; Jun Yao; Yu Bai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Is there a safer electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis?

Authors:  Erkan Parlak; Aydın Şeref Köksal; Erkin Öztaş; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Bülent Ödemiş; Mahmut Yüksel; Hakan Yıldız; Nurgül Şaşmaz; Burhan Şahin
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdellah Hedjoudje; Chérifa Cheurfa; Jad Farha; Bénédicte Jaïs; Alain Aubert; Diane Lorenzo; Frédérique Maire; Dilhana Badurdeen; Vivek Kumbhari; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  A prospective randomized controlled study of endoscopic sphincterotomy with the Endocut mode or conventional blended cut mode.

Authors:  Yoshiki Tanaka; Ken Sato; Hiroyuki Tsuchida; Masafumi Mizuide; Hidetoshi Yasuoka; Katsutoshi Ishida; Masatomo Mori; Motoyasu Kusano; Masanobu Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.062

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.