Literature DB >> 9688326

Regeneration of implanted splenic tissue in the rat: re-innervation is host age-dependent and necessary for tissue development.

J Westermann1, S Michel, S Lopez-Kostka, U Bode, H J Rothkötter, M Bette, E Weihe, R H Straub, R Pabst.   

Abstract

The loss of spleen may lead to fatal bacterial infections. To prevent this, splenic autotransplantation has been performed in humans and experimental animals. However, there is still controversy about the protective function of this procedure. Since innervation plays an important role in splenic function, we investigated whether splenic regenerates are re-innervated, and whether this depends on the donor and host age. Splenic tissue (30 mg) was implanted into the greater omentum of either young (2 days) or old (12 months) rats, from either young or old syngeneic animals. After 3 months of regeneration, the weight of the regenerates was determined, PGP+ nerve fibers were revealed by immunohistology, and subdivided into nerve fibers of sympathetic (TH+, NPY+) or sensory (SP+, CGRP+) origin. In addition, proliferating (Ki-67 proliferation antigen+) and apoptotic cells (TUNEL technique+) were likewise investigated. No innervation of splenic regenerates was observed after implantation into old hosts, correlating with poorly developed splenic compartments. In contrast, almost normal re-innervation occurred in young hosts after implantation of both young and old splenic tissue. These regenerates showed well-developed splenic compartments and a normal number and tissue distribution of proliferating and apoptotic cells. However, after the implantation of young tissue, the final size of splenic regenerates was three times larger (140 +/- 30 vs. 40 +/- 10 mg). Thus, re-innervation of splenic implants is necessary for their subsequent development. It is determined by host age, whereas the final size of the splenic regenerates is regulated by donor age-dependent factors. This model is useful for studying both the process leading to initial innervation and the consequences of this innervation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9688326     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5728(98)00081-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimmunol        ISSN: 0165-5728            Impact factor:   3.478


  5 in total

Review 1.  Regeneration of autotransplanted splenic fragments: basic immunological and clinical relevance.

Authors:  R Pabst
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Murine spleen tissue regeneration from neonatal spleen capsule requires lymphotoxin priming of stromal cells.

Authors:  Jonathan K H Tan; Takeshi Watanabe
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Near-total splenectomy: a new technique for the management of hereditary spherocytosis.

Authors:  Gerhard A Stoehr; Urs G Stauffer; Stefan W Eber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Spleen: Reparative Regeneration and Influence on Liver.

Authors:  Andrey Elchaninov; Polina Vishnyakova; Gennady Sukhikh; Timur Fatkhudinov
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 5.  Determinants of postnatal spleen tissue regeneration and organogenesis.

Authors:  Jonathan K H Tan; Takeshi Watanabe
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2018-01-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.