Literature DB >> 9687976

Modulation of radiation-induced strand break repair by cisplatin in mammalian cells.

J A Dolling1, D R Boreham, D L Brown, R E Mitchel, G P Raaphorst.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA lesions in human skin fibroblasts in the presence of cisplatin-DNA adducts and to determine the persistence of DNA repair inhibition by cisplatin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Normal human fibroblasts (AG 1522) treated with cisplatin were exposed to 4 Gy 60Co gamma-radiation and assayed for repair of radiation-induced damage under growth-permissive conditions. DNA damage was measured by the fluorescence analysis of DNA unwinding (FADU) and cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assays.
RESULTS: Rejoining of strand breaks caused by 4 Gy radiation in cells without cisplatin pre-treatment appeared to be biphasic with an initial fast component (up to 15 min of repair time) followed by a slower component, and was completed by 90 min. Cisplatin treatment (10 microg/ml, 30 min) immediately before irradiation had no effect on the fast rejoining component, but inhibited the slow component (p<0.01). The same cisplatin treatment 24 h prior to irradiation inhibited both slow and fast components (p<0.01). In contrast, decreasing the cisplatin exposure to 1.0 microg/ml for 30 min, 24h prior to irradiation, resulted in an increased amount of strand break repair at each time point measured compared with irradiated control cells. This mild cisplatin treatment (95% survival) also resulted in a reduction of radiation-generated micronuclei indicating an adaptive response.
CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin used in combination with ionizing radiation can produce differential cellular responses depending upon the severity of the cisplatin treatment and the time interval between cisplatin and radiation exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9687976     DOI: 10.1080/095530098141735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  10 in total

1.  Cisplatin-DNA adducts inhibit translocation of the Ku subunits of DNA-PK.

Authors:  J J Turchi; K M Henkels; Y Zhou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Complex cisplatin-double strand break (DSB) lesions directly impair cellular non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) independent of downstream damage response (DDR) pathways.

Authors:  Catherine R Sears; John J Turchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Cisplatin sensitizes cancer cells to ionizing radiation via inhibition of nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Heather J Boeckman; Kelly S Trego; John J Turchi
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 4.  The DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Glioma: Molecular Players and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Semer Maksoud
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Sterility of gamma-irradiated pathogens: a new mathematical formula to calculate sterilizing doses.

Authors:  Eve V Singleton; Shannon C David; Justin B Davies; Timothy R Hirst; James C Paton; Michael R Beard; Farhid Hemmatzadeh; Mohammed Alsharifi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin.

Authors:  Leonard L Gunderson; Kathryn A Winter; Jaffer A Ajani; John E Pedersen; Jennifer Moughan; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  MutS homologue hMSH5: role in cisplatin-induced DNA damage response.

Authors:  Joshua D Tompkins; Xiling Wu; Chengtao Her
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 27.401

8.  Cisplatin plus capecitabine concomitant with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma: the experience of a single research cancer center.

Authors:  Maria Saveria Rotundo; Maria Giulia Zampino; Paola Simona Ravenda; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giulia Peveri; Veronica Dell'Acqua; Alessia Surgo; Cristina Trovato; Luca Bottiglieri; Emilio Bertani; Wanda Luisa Petz; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Nicola Fazio
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 9.  Adaption By Low Dose Radiation Exposure: A Look at Scope and Limitations for Radioprotection.

Authors:  Ron E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Different responses of tumor and normal cells to low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Hongsheng Yu; Ning Liu; Hao Wang; Qingjun Shang; Peng Jiang; Yuanmei Zhang
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-10-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.