Literature DB >> 968736

Delineation of critical factors in the treatment of pancreatic trauma.

R C Heitsch, C O Knutson, R L Fulton, C E Jones.   

Abstract

An analysis of 100 patients sustaining multiple injury and pancreatic trauma was completed. Sixteen patients with penetrating injury died within the first 24 hours, 14 of whom died intraoperatively from major hepatic and/or retroperitoneal venous injury. Eighty-four patients survived long enough to permit evaluation of treatment. There was no statistically significant relationship between mode (p = 0.3) or anatomic area (p = 0.5) of injury and death. However, death was more common in the presence of duct injury (p less than 0.0001). Thirty-nine patients were determined to have duct injury and 45 did not. These two groups were equivalent, with the exception of a higher incidence of concomitant bowel injury (p less than 0.05) in those with duct violation. Combined sump and Penrose drainage was found to be adequate treatment of both proximal and distal nonductal injury with no significant difference in mortality or morbidity rates (p = 0.5). Resection of distal ductal injuries as opposed to drainage alone resulted in significantly lower morbidity and mortality rates (p less than 0.05), comparable to those of drained nonductal injuries. No conclusions could be made relevant to proximal duct injuries, except that drainage alone is inadequate. Seventeen (20 percent) of the 84 patients evaluated died. Pancreatic related mortality rate was 17 percent (14 patients). Two of 23 patients with blunt injury (9 percent) and 12 of 61 patients with penetrating injury (20 percent died). Gram-negative sepsis (82 percent) was the most common cause of death (p less than 0.01), and sepsis was correlated with the presence of pancreatic duct (p less than 0.0001) and bowel (p less than 0.001) injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 968736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating blunt pancreatic trauma at whole body CT: current practices and future directions.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Matthew Bordegaray; Nikki Tirada; Siva P Raman; Kevin Kadakia; Felipe Munera
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-06-06

2.  Factors affecting morbidity and mortality in pancreatic injuries.

Authors:  Z Bozdag; M Kapan; B V Ulger; A Turkoglu; O Uslukaya; A Oğuz; M Aldemir
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?

Authors:  D A Potoka; B A Gaines; A Leppäniemi; A B Peitzman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Review of general surgery 1976.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Review of pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  K E Glancy
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-07

6.  Computed tomography for pancreatic injuries in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Hamdi Hameed Almaramhy; Salman Yousuf Guraya
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-27

7.  A heuristic approach and heretic view on the technical issues and pitfalls in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries.

Authors:  Tugba H Yilmaz; Brown C Ndofor; Martin D Smith; Elias Degiannis
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Management of pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  R C Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  [Retroperitoneal lesions of the duodenum and pancreas (author's transl)].

Authors:  K Schwemmle
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1978-11

Review 10.  Imaging of blunt pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  Satinder Rekhi; Stephan W Anderson; James T Rhea; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.