Literature DB >> 9685538

Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial.

A M Lacy1, S Delgado, J C García-Valdecasas, A Castells, J M Piqué, L Grande, J Fuster, E M Targarona, M Pera, J Visa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to prospectively assess the impact of the laparoscopic approach to the patterns of port site metastases (PSM) and recurrence rate (RR) of resected colon carcinomas as compared with conventional colectomies.
METHODS: All patients were included in a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) versus open colectomy (OC) for colon cancer. The randomization was stratified for localization of the lesion. Patients with metastasic disease at time of the surgery were excluded. Follow-up in the outpatient clinic was done every 3 months for a minimum of 12 months. Endpoints for the study were metastasis at port site and laparotomy incision as well as recurrence rate.
RESULTS: Of 91 segmental colectomies performed from November 1993 to January 1996, there were 44 LAC and 47 OC. Patient data were similar in both groups (age, sex, Dukes stage, type of operation). Mean follow-up was 21.4 months, with a range of 13 to 41 months. There were no wounds or PSM in those series. RR was similar for both groups. For LAC, it was five of 31 (16.1%); for OC, it was six of 40 (15%).
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach has a recurrence rate similar to that for open procedures for colon cancer. However, additional follow-up of these patients is needed before we can determine whether or not the laparoscopic approach influences overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9685538     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  53 in total

1.  Current status of laparoscopic colectomy--is it experimental?

Authors:  H Nelson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery on cancer cell growth.

Authors:  S Takiguchi; N Matsuura; Y Hamada; E Taniguchi; M Sekimoto; M Tsujinaka; H Shiozaki; M Monden; S Ohashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical management of colon cancer.

Authors:  Patrick H D Colquhoun; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-10

5.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Should carcinoma of the colon be treated laparoscopically? Point.

Authors:  R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Port-site metastasis after minimally invasive cancer surgery.

Authors:  B Shpitz; E Klein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Laparoscopic colon surgery. Indications and technique].

Authors:  C-T Germer; J-P Ritz; H J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Portal branch ligation does not counteract the inhibiting effect of temsirolimus on extrahepatic colorectal metastatic growth.

Authors:  Sebastian Senger; Jens Sperling; Barbara Oberkircher; Martin K Schilling; Otto Kollmar; Michael D Menger; Christian Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?

Authors:  Ricardo M Bonnor; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.