Literature DB >> 9685472

Videotape increases parent knowledge about poliovirus vaccines and choices of polio vaccination schedules.

R A Dunn1, P E Shenouda, D R Martin, A J Schultz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of an educational videotape about poliovirus vaccines and choices of schedules for parents/guardians of children starting the polio vaccination series.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial comparing two educational interventions.
SETTING: Five pediatric offices (two university-based, two health maintenance organization staff models, and one private practice) and a local health department immunization clinic in the greater Lansing, MI, area. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 287 parents/guardians of 2- to 3-month-olds presenting for well-child care and due for the first set of immunizations including poliovirus vaccine.
INTERVENTIONS: Parents/guardians were randomized to read the vaccine information statement (VIS) alone or to read the VIS and view a 15-minute videotape about polio vaccination and choices of schedules produced by Michigan State University. The intervention groups were similar by race/ethnicity, education, and relationship to the child. OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in knowledge about the risk of poliomyelitis in the United States, transmission of poliomyelitis, characteristics of the two poliovirus vaccines, and choices of polio vaccination schedules; and parent opinion on effectiveness of the interventions, as measured by pre- and postintervention questionnaires.
RESULTS: Both interventions resulted in increased test scores of knowledge. However, videotape viewers scored significantly higher on their posttest compared with parents/guardians assigned to VIS only. This significant increase was noted across all practice types, two of three major racial/ethnic groups, and educational levels. (The increase for Hispanic parents/guardians approached significance). Reading the VIS did not improve posttest scores for videotape viewers. Reading the VIS did improve posttest scores for those assigned to VIS only, but these scores still were not as high as for videotape viewers who did not read the VIS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a complicated discussion of risks/benefits of two vaccines and their schedules of administration could be communicated effectively via a videotaped presentation. In addition, the videotape was more effective than VIS alone in increasing short-term knowledge, regardless of practice type, race/ethnicity, or educational level. As immunization schedules increase in complexity and parents are asked to make more choices, videotaped information may be a better method to achieve the goal of truly informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9685472     DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.2.e26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  12 in total

1.  The risks of multimedia methods: effects of actor's race and gender on preferences for health states.

Authors:  L A Lenert; J Ziegler; T Lee; C Unfred; R Mahmoud
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Assessment of Parental Understanding of Positive Newborn Screening Results and Carrier Status for Cystic Fibrosis with the use of a Short Educational Video.

Authors:  R Temme; A Gruber; M Johnson; L Read; Y Lu; J McNamara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Designing computerized decision support that works for clinicians and families.

Authors:  Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2011-03

4.  Impact of a patient decision aid on care among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Sharon E Straus; William A Ghali; David Anderson; Sumit R Majumdar; Paul Gibson; Jafna L Cox; Miriam Fradette
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged?

Authors:  Andrew D M Kennedy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Elizabeth R Drake; George A Wells; Peter Tugwell; Andreas Laupacis; Tom Elmslie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Oral antibiotics at discharge for children with acute osteomyelitis: a rapid cycle improvement project.

Authors:  Patrick W Brady; William B Brinkman; Jeffrey M Simmons; Connie Yau; Christine M White; Eric S Kirkendall; Joshua K Schaffzin; Patrick H Conway; Michael T Vossmeyer
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Shared decision-making to improve attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder care.

Authors:  William B Brinkman; Jessica Hartl Majcher; Lauren M Poling; Gaoyan Shi; Mike Zender; Heidi Sucharew; Maria T Britto; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  A multimedia mobile phone-based youth smoking cessation intervention: findings from content development and piloting studies.

Authors:  Robyn Whittaker; Ralph Maddison; Hayden McRobbie; Chris Bullen; Simon Denny; Enid Dorey; Mary Ellis-Pegler; Jaco van Rooyen; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Alison Lott; Dean A Fergusson; Kaveh G Shojania; Jonathan Kimmelman; Raphael Saginur
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.