Literature DB >> 9682562

Magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for evaluation of bone prior to implant surgery.

C F Gray1, T W Redpath, F W Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the potential for use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to gain full sectional information before placement of osseo-integrated dental implants, with no patient exposure to ionising radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four typical cases are illustrated, the patients being imaged in a one tesla MRI scanner. The setting up of the sequences is explained, along with the use of an imaging/surgical template with gadolinium markers.
RESULTS: MRI clearly shows full sectional detail of available bone for safe implant placement, and allows the delineation of cortical and cancellous bone to attain maximum implant length and stability. Vital structures and the floor of the maxillary sinus are clearly shown.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI allows the surgeon to assess cases for suitability to place dental implants with confidence. The ability to scan directly at any desired plane, with no reformatting, and to relate this information to a surgical template gives predictable surgery. MRI is a sectional imaging modality giving information about the 3-dimensional relationship of the vital structures, without using ionising radiation. It therefore deserves consideration as an alternative to computed tomography. However, further work is indicated to investigate the relative technical merits of the two imaging modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9682562     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  5 in total

1.  Study of inferior dental canal and its contents using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrej Krasny; Nicolai Krasny; Andreas Prescher
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  O Tymofiyeva; K Rottner; P M Jakob; E-J Richter; P Proff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Reproducibility of Frankfort horizontal plane on 3D multi-planar reconstructed MR images.

Authors:  Amro Daboul; Christian Schwahn; Grit Schaffner; Silvia Soehnel; Stefanie Samietz; Ahmad Aljaghsi; Mohamad Habes; Mohammad Habes; Katrin Hegenscheid; Ralf Puls; Thomas Klinke; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI for the assessment of caries lesions.

Authors:  A-K Bracher; C Hofmann; A Bornstedt; E Hell; F Janke; J Ulrici; B Haller; M-A Geibel; V Rasche
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Does craniofacial morphology affect third molars impaction? Results from a population-based study in northeastern Germany.

Authors:  Stefan Kindler; Till Ittermann; Robin Bülow; Birte Holtfreter; Catharina Klausenitz; Philine Metelmann; Maria Mksoud; Christiane Pink; Christian Seebauer; Thomas Kocher; Thomas Koppe; Karl-Friedrich Krey; Hans-Robert Metelmann; Henry Völzke; Amro Daboul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.