Literature DB >> 9681608

Long-term results of porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position.

K Kuwaki1, K Komatsu, K Morishita, M Tsukamoto, T Abe.   

Abstract

From January 1976 to September 1994, 26 patients underwent a tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with porcine bioprostheses (Hancock II in 19 patients, Carpentier-Edwards in 3, Hancock standard in 2, Medtronic-Intact in 1, and Liotta in 1). The mean age of these patients was 38.4 years (range, 9 to 70 years). The mean follow-up period was 6.7 years (range, 1.8 to 16.5 years). There was a complete follow-up in 100%. There were two hospital deaths and three late deaths. The actuarial survival rate at 16 years was 78.7%+/-8.6%. Five patients developed structural deterioration. Four of these 5 patients underwent re-TVR. The actuarial freedom rate from structural deterioration at 10 years was 47.1%+/-19.1%. There were no instances of thromboembolism and prosthetic valve endocarditis. Our experience indicated the major problem of the porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position thus to be valve durability: however, the long-term actuarial survival rate was satisfactory, including no operative morality with re-TVR due to tricuspid prosthetic structural deterioration. We therefore conclude that the choice of a porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position should be considered not only for patients with isolated tricuspid valve disease, but also for the patients who have not previously received mechanical valves in the mitral or the aortic valve position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9681608     DOI: 10.1007/s005950050191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  19 in total

1.  Tricuspid valve replacement: factors influencing early and late mortality.

Authors:  T K Kaul; J L Mercer
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Tricuspid valve prosthetic replacement. Early and late results with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis.

Authors:  P M Sanfelippo; E R Giuliani; G K Danielson; R B Wallace; J R Pluth; D C McGoon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Determinants of reoperation after 960 valve replacements with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses.

Authors:  D D Glower; W D White; A C Hatton; L R Smith; W G Young; W G Wolfe; J E Lowe
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Guerra; U Bortolotti; G Thiene; A Milano; A Mazzucco; E Talenti; G Stellin; V Gallucci
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Malfunction of Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis in tricuspid position.

Authors:  P D Bourdillon; G P Sharratt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1976-11

6.  Comparison of late (62 to 140 months) degenerative changes in simultaneously implanted and explanted porcine (Hancock) bioprostheses in the tricuspid and mitral valve positions in six patients.

Authors:  S R Cohen; M A Silver; C L McIntosh; W C Roberts
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Y Kawachi; R Tominaga; M Hisahara; A Nakashima; H Yasui; K Tokunaga
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Long-term results of St. Jude Medical valve in the tricuspid position.

Authors:  A K Singh; W C Feng; S J Sanofsky
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Long-term results of tricuspid valve replacement and the problem of prosthetic valve thrombosis.

Authors:  C W Thorburn; J J Morgan; M X Shanahan; V P Chang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.

Authors:  H E Scully; C S Armstrong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

2.  Unusual 30-year durability of Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis in tricuspid position.

Authors:  Bachar El Oumeiri; Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Guido Van Nooten
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-02-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.