Literature DB >> 9680598

The development and evolution of artificial urethral sphincters.

C A Hajivassiliou1.   

Abstract

This history and evolution of mechanical devices designed to achieve urinary continence are reviewed. The following devices were studies: Foley clamp, Kaufman prosthesis, Giori, Summers and Rosen sphincters, Gruneberger and Cleveland Clinic magnetic designs, Craggs sphincter and the AMS family of sphincters (AMS 721, AMS 761, AMS 742 (A, B, C), AMS 792, AMS 800). The design of active hydraulic devices is discussed in more detail. This review analyses the problems relating to the application of pressure and the presence of foreign material around the urethra. 'Volume set' devices are universally unsuccessful and detrimental for urethral integrity as opposed to 'pressure set' hydraulic sphincters (e.g. AMS 800). The implications for the design of artificial implants are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680598     DOI: 10.3109/03091909809032533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Eng Technol        ISSN: 0309-1902


  3 in total

1.  [Artificial sphincter for the treatment of incontinence].

Authors:  N Djakovic; J Huber; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence: is the bulbourethral sling a viable alternative to the artificial urinary sphincter?

Authors:  Steven P Petrou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.862

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.