Literature DB >> 9680348

Presence of a p53 gene deletion in patients with multiple myeloma predicts for short survival after conventional-dose chemotherapy.

J Drach1, J Ackermann, E Fritz, E Krömer, R Schuster, H Gisslinger, M DeSantis, N Zojer, M Fiegl, S Roka, J Schuster, R Heinz, H Ludwig, H Huber.   

Abstract

In multiple myeloma (MM), previous studies showed that mutations of the p53 gene are rare events in patients with newly diagnosed disease, but it is not known whether deletions of p53 are of any significance in MM. To address this question, we used interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a DNA probe specific for the p53 locus at 17p13 and investigated bone marrow plasma cells from 72 patients with MM (59 patients = 81.9% before therapy). By FISH, deletions of p53, which were found to be predominantly monoallelic, were detected in 32.8% and 54.5% of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed MM, respectively. Karyotypes from six of the patients with a p53 deletion by FISH showed a structural abnormality of 17p in only one of them. Additional FISH studies including a distal-17p probe (specific for the D17S34 locus) provided evidence for an interstitial deletion on 17p resulting in loss of p53 hybridization signals in myeloma cells. Among all 59 patients with newly diagnosed MM, presence of a p53 deletion was associated with stage III (P = .054), but not with other laboratory and clinical parameters. Patients with a p53 deletion had significantly shorter survival time compared with those without a deletion, both from the time of diagnosis (median 13.9 v 38.7 months; P < .0001) and from the time of initiation of induction treatment consisting of conventional dose chemotherapy (median 15.9 months v median not reached at 38 months; P < .0002). On stepwise multivariate regression analysis, presence of a p53 deletion was the most significant independent parameter predicting for shortened survival (P = .002). We conclude that a p53 gene deletion, which can be identified by interphase FISH in almost a third of patients with newly diagnosed MM, is a novel prognostic factor predicting for short survival of MM patients treated with conventional-dose chemotherapy. Copyright 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  76 in total

Review 1.  Microarray-based understanding of normal and malignant plasma cells.

Authors:  John De Vos; Dirk Hose; Thierry Rème; Karin Tarte; Jérôme Moreaux; Karéne Mahtouk; Michel Jourdan; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jean-François Rossi; Friedrich W Cremer; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.988

2.  The novel autophagy inhibitor elaiophylin exerts antitumor activity against multiple myeloma with mutant TP53 in part through endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Gaoxiang Wang; Pan Zhou; Xing Chen; Lei Zhao; Jiaqi Tan; Yang Yang; Yong Fang; Jianfeng Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  Genomics in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Impact of cytogenetic classification on outcomes following early high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G P Kaufman; M A Gertz; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; D Dingli; S R Hayman; P Kapoor; J A Lust; S Russell; R S Go; Y L Hwa; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar; S K Kumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Multistep tumorigenesis of multiple myeloma: its molecular delineation.

Authors:  Shinsuke Iida; Ryuzo Ueda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Prognostic implications of chromosome 17 abnormalities in the context of monosomal karyotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and complex cytogenetics.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Hagop M Kantarjian; Vijaya R Bhatt; Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez; Jorge E Cortes; Tapan Kadia; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Lynne Abruzzo; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Farhad Ravandi; Michael Keating; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-22

8.  Hypodiploid multiple myeloma is characterized by more aggressive molecular markers than non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Scott Van Wier; Esteban Braggio; Angela Baker; Gregory Ahmann; Joan Levy; John D Carpten; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Cancer stem cells: controversies in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sarah K Brennan; William Matsui
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Identification of networks of co-occurring, tumor-related DNA copy number changes using a genome-wide scoring approach.

Authors:  Christiaan Klijn; Jan Bot; David J Adams; Marcel Reinders; Lodewyk Wessels; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.