Literature DB >> 23716545

Hypodiploid multiple myeloma is characterized by more aggressive molecular markers than non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

Scott Van Wier1, Esteban Braggio, Angela Baker, Gregory Ahmann, Joan Levy, John D Carpten, Rafael Fonseca.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma can be categorized into hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid myeloma based on the number of chromosomes found in the tumor clone. Among the non-hyperdiploid myelomas, the hypodiploid subtype has the most aggressive clinical phenotype, but the genetic differences between groups are not completely defined. In order to understand the genetic background of hypodiploid multiple myeloma better, we compared the genomic (array-based comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic (gene expression profiling) background of 49 patients with hypodiploid myeloma with 50 other non-hyperdiploid and 125 hyperdiploid myeloma patients. There were significant chromosomal and gene expression differences between hyperdiploid patients and non-hyperdiploid and hypodiploid patients. Non-hyperdiploid and hypodiploid patients shared most of the chromosomal abnormalities; nevertheless a subset of these abnormalities, such as monosomies 13, 14 and 22, was markedly increased in hypodiploid patients. Furthermore, deletions of 1p, 12p, 16q and 17p, all associated with poor outcome or progression in multiple myeloma, were significantly enriched in hypodiploid patients. Molecular risk-stratification indices reinforce the worse prognosis associated with hypodiploid multiple myeloma compared with non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma. Gene expression profiling clustered hypodiploid and non-hyperdiploid subgroups closer than hyperdiploid myeloma but also highlighted the up-regulation of CCND2, WHSC1/MMSET and FGFR3 in the hypodiploid subtype. In summary, hypodiploid multiple myeloma is genetically similar to non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma but characterized by a higher prevalence of genetic alterations associated with poor outcome and disease progression. It is provocative to hypothesize that hypodiploid multiple myeloma is an advanced stage of non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716545      PMCID: PMC3789464          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.081083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  35 in total

1.  Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  N V Smadja; C Bastard; C Brigaudeau; D Leroux; C Fruchart
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The clinical significance of cytogenetic studies in 100 patients with multiple myeloma, plasma cell leukemia, or amyloidosis.

Authors:  G W Dewald; R A Kyle; G A Hicks; P R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Cytogenetic findings in 200 patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J R Sawyer; J A Waldron; S Jagannath; B Barlogie
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1995-07-01

Review 4.  Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA flow cytometry in neoplastic hematopathology.

Authors:  R E Duque; M Andreeff; R C Braylan; L W Diamond; S C Peiper
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1993

5.  Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jonathan J Keats; Marta Chesi; Jan B Egan; Victoria M Garbitt; Stephen E Palmer; Esteban Braggio; Scott Van Wier; Patrick R Blackburn; Angela S Baker; Angela Dispenzieri; Shaji Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; John D Carpten; Michael Barrett; Rafael Fonseca; A Keith Stewart; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Chromosome abnormalities clustering and its implications for pathogenesis and prognosis in myeloma.

Authors:  C S Debes-Marun; G W Dewald; S Bryant; E Picken; R Santana-Dávila; N González-Paz; J M Winkler; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; T E Witzig; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; S V Rajkumar; J A Lust; P R Greipp; R Fonseca
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily Blood; Montserrat Rue; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Brian Van Ness; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Richard J Bailey; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Overexpression of c-maf is a frequent oncogenic event in multiple myeloma that promotes proliferation and pathological interactions with bone marrow stroma.

Authors:  Elaine M Hurt; Adrian Wiestner; Andreas Rosenwald; A L Shaffer; Elias Campo; Tom Grogan; P Leif Bergsagel; W Michael Kuehl; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Both hypodiploidy and deletion of chromosome 13 independently confer poor prognosis in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Athanasios B-T Fassas; Tray Spencer; Jeffrey Sawyer; Maurizio Zangari; Choon-Kee Lee; Elias Anaissie; Firas Muwalla; Christopher Morris; Bart Barlogie; Guido Tricot
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Bart Barlogie; Regis Bataille; Christian Bastard; P Leif Bergsagel; Marta Chesi; Faith E Davies; Johannes Drach; Philip R Greipp; Ilan R Kirsch; W Michael Kuehl; Jesus M Hernandez; Stephane Minvielle; Linda M Pilarski; John D Shaughnessy; A Keith Stewart; Herve Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  22 in total

1.  Lenalidomide Enhances Immune Checkpoint Blockade-Induced Immune Response in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Güllü Görgün; Mehmet K Samur; Kristen B Cowens; Steven Paula; Giada Bianchi; Julie E Anderson; Randie E White; Ahaana Singh; Hiroto Ohguchi; Rikio Suzuki; Shohei Kikuchi; Takeshi Harada; Teru Hideshima; Yu-Tzu Tai; Jacob P Laubach; Noopur Raje; Florence Magrangeas; Stephane Minvielle; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi; David M Dorfman; Paul G Richardson; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Future of Personalized Therapy Targeting Aberrant Signaling Pathways in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Faiz Anwer; Kevin Mathew Gee; Ahmad Iftikhar; Mirza Baig; Atlantis Dawn Russ; Sabina Saeed; Muhammad Abu Zar; Faryal Razzaq; Jennifer Carew; Steffan Nawrocki; Hussam Al-Kateb; Nadia Nunes Cavalcante Parr; Ali McBride; Jason Valent; Christy Samaras
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-03-25

Review 3.  Evolutionary biology of high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Charlotte Pawlyn; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Staging and prognostication of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Jorge Monge; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.929

5.  Comprehensive CRISPR-Cas9 screens identify genetic determinants of drug responsiveness in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Stephan R Bohl; Laura K Schmalbrock; Imke Bauhuf; Tatjana Meyer; Anna Dolnik; Martin Szyska; Tamara J Blätte; Sarah Knödler; Linda Röhner; Denise Miller; Miriam Kull; Christian Langer; Hartmut Döhner; Anthony Letai; Frederik Damm; Dirk Heckl; Lars Bullinger; Jan Krönke
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-05-11

6.  Outcomes Among High-Risk and Standard-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Syed M Kazmi; Maliha Nusrat; Hilal Gunaydin; Amanda M Cornelison; Nina Shah; Partow Kebriaei; Yago Nieto; Simrit Parmar; Uday R Popat; Betul Oran; Jatin J Shah; Robert Z Orlowski; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2015-08-05

Review 7.  Risk Stratification in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Melissa Gaik-Ming Ooi; Sanjay de Mel; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Targeted sequencing using a 47 gene multiple myeloma mutation panel (M(3) P) in -17p high risk disease.

Authors:  Klaus M Kortüm; Christian Langer; Jorge Monge; Laura Bruins; Jan B Egan; Yuan X Zhu; Chang Xin Shi; Patrick Jedlowski; Jessica Schmidt; Juhi Ojha; Lars Bullinger; Peter Liebisch; Miriam Kull; Mia D Champion; Scott Van Wier; Gregory Ahmann; Leo Rasche; Stefan Knop; Rafael Fonseca; Hermann Einsele; A Keith Stewart; Esteban Braggio
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Prognostic impact of hyperdiploidy in multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics: a pilot study in China.

Authors:  Jiangang Mei; Yongping Zhai; Hanqing Li; Feng Li; Xiaogang Zhou; Ping Song; Qian Zhao; Yaping Yu; Zhiming An; Liping Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Blood-based risk stratification for pre-malignant and symptomatic plasma cell neoplasms to improve patient management.

Authors:  María A Vasco-Mogorrón; José A Campillo; Adela Periago; Valentin Cabañas; Mercedes Berenguer; María C García-Garay; Lourdes Gimeno; María F Soto-Ramírez; María D Martínez-Hernández; Manuel Muro; Alfredo Minguela
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.