Literature DB >> 9679820

Mycophenolate mofetil-based, cyclosporine-free induction and maintenance immunosuppression: first-3-months analysis of efficacy and safety in two cohorts of renal allograft recipients.

B Zanker1, H Schneeberger, U Rothenpieler, G Hillebrand, W D Illner, I Theodorakis, M Stangl, W Land.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The currently used macrolide immunosuppressants, i.e., cyclosporine and tacrolimus, exert considerable nephrotoxicity. We aimed to avoid the nephrotoxic effects by applying a cyclosporine-free regimen for the induction as well as for the maintenance treatment of renal allograft recipients using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as the primary immunosuppressant.
METHODS: Thirteen patients were converted from cyclosporine (CsA) to MMF monotherapy. For 4 weeks, MMF (2 g/day) was added to the CsA treatment, before CsA was tapered by weekly steps of 25 mg/day and without "safeguard treatment" with additional immunosuppressants. In a second approach, 12 patients older than 50 years, and receiving a renal graft from a donor older than 50 years, were treated primarily with MMF combined with steroids and an induction therapy using antithymocyte globulin, and without the addition of CsA.
RESULTS: Thirteen long-term renal transplant patients could be converted from CsA to MMF monotherapy. Conversion resulted in an immediate and long-lasting improvement of their median creatinine values by 20%. No serious adverse events occurred. In the second cohort of 12 patients, MMF was used as the primary immunosuppressant. All patients are alive and no grafts were lost after 4 months (n= 12) and after 6 months (n=7). The median creatinine values achieved after 4 and 6 months were 1.16+/-0.25 and 1.30+/-0.21 mg/dl, respectively. One patient was converted to CsA because of a reversible rejection episode (8.3%), and another patient was converted because of cytomegalovirus disease. Major complications consisted of wound-healing disturbances (16.6%) and cytomegalovirus infections (41.6%).
CONCLUSION: MMF monotherapy can be safely applied as long-term maintenance immunosuppression with improvement of renal function. Steroids are not required as an adjunct to MMF. MMF monotherapy, in the absence of drug-related nephrotoxicity, is particularly beneficial for grafts derived from marginal donors, such as donors of advanced age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9679820     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199807150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs.

Authors:  A Johnston; D W Holt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Immunosuppressant-induced nephropathy: pathophysiology, incidence and management.

Authors:  A J Olyaei; A M de Mattos; W M Bennett
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Effect of immunosuppressive agents on long-term survival of renal transplant recipients: focus on the cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Johannes M M Boots; Maarten H L Christiaans; Johannes P van Hooff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments.

Authors:  Markus Giessing; Tom Florian Fuller; Max Tuellmann; Torsten Slowinski; Klemens Budde; Lutz Liefeldt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 5.  Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Wound Healing Complications in Kidney Transplantation: Old Myths and New Realities.

Authors:  Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil; Saeed M G Al-Ghamdi; Ubaidullah Shaik Dawood; Said Sayed Ahmed Khamis; Hideki Ishida; Vui Heng Chong; Jackson Tan
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2022-02-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.