Literature DB >> 17333201

Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments.

Markus Giessing1, Tom Florian Fuller, Max Tuellmann, Torsten Slowinski, Klemens Budde, Lutz Liefeldt.   

Abstract

Owing to the increasing disparity of organ demand and organ supply the search for optimal immunosuppressive strategies has become a central issue in kidney transplantation (KTX). In the focus today are modifications of the use of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs, Cyclosporine A/Tacrolimus) and steroids, as they are nephrotoxic and promote cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. These modifications can either be withdrawal or avoidance of these substances in combination with new and/or established immunosuppressants. Because about half of all KTXs are performed by or with the help of urologists' knowledge of modern immunosuppressive regimens is crucial also for urologists. We performed a literature research (PubMed, DIMDI, medline) for CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols and studies to elucidate their influence on graft-function and graft- and patient-survival. New substances and actual studies were also evaluated. Several published reports on CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols after KTX exist, including withdrawal, reduction or avoidance. The time of reduction seems to be crucial: an initially increased immune response should be counterbalanced by an initially intensified immunosuppression. Therefore, late steroid withdrawal seems to be safer than early withdrawal especially in Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Steroid avoidance also seems feasible on a CNI based regimen, especially in context with induction therapy. Withdrawal or avoidance of CNIs seems feasible with mycophenolate acid and/or induction therapy with IL 2-receptor antibodies as co-immunosuppressants. This is of interest in grafts with deteriorating function or from donors with extended criteria. Also, CNI- and steroid-free immunosuppression can be successfully performed with new immunosuppressants but results are yet premature. CNI- and/or steroid reduction, withdrawal or even avoidance is feasible. As long-term graft function is the goal of KTX and as more kidneys from donors with extended criteria are transplanted "tailored immunosuppression" will replace standards in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333201     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0157-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  46 in total

1.  Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet A Butler; Paul Roderick; Mark Mullee; Juan C Mason; Robert C Peveler
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Allan D Kirk; Roslyn B Mannon; S John Swanson; Douglas A Hale
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.782

3.  Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study.

Authors:  Stefan Vítko; Marian Klinger; Kaija Salmela; Zbigniew Wlodarczyk; Gunnar Tydèn; Grzegorz Senatorski; Marek Ostrowski; Per Fauchald; Franciszek Kokot; Sergio Stefoni; Ferenc Perner; Kerstin Claesson; Marco Castagneto; Uwe Heemann; Mario Carmellini; Jean-Paul Squifflet; Markus Weber; Giuseppe Segoloni; Lars Bäckman; Heide Sperschneider; Bernhard K Krämer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study.

Authors:  Christopher Dudley; Erich Pohanka; Hany Riad; Jarmila Dedochova; Peter Wijngaard; Carolyn Sutter; Hélio Tedesco Silva
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Long-term results of a randomized study comparing three immunosuppressive schedules with cyclosporine in cadaveric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Montagnino; Antonio Tarantino; Giuseppe P Segoloni; Vincenzo Cambi; Gaetano Rizzo; Paolo Altieri; Marco Castagneto; Maurizio Salvadori; Maria Cossu; Francesco Pisani; Mario Carmellini; Francesco Mastrangelo; Roberto Ferrara; Claudio Ponticelli
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Five years of steroid sparing in renal transplantation with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  Richard Borrows; Kakit Chan; Marina Loucaidou; Christopher Lawrence; Jen Van Tromp; Tom Cairns; Megan Griffith; Nadey Hakim; Adam McLean; Andrew Palmer; Vassilios Papalois; David Taube
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Flavio Vincenti; Christian Larsen; Antoine Durrbach; Thomas Wekerle; Björn Nashan; Gilles Blancho; Philippe Lang; Josep Grinyo; Philip F Halloran; Kim Solez; David Hagerty; Elliott Levy; Wenjiong Zhou; Kannan Natarajan; Bernard Charpentier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Sirolimus monotherapy: feasible immunosuppression for long-term follow-up of kidney transplantation--a pilot experience.

Authors:  Fritz Diekmann; Alex Gutierrez-Dalmau; José Vicente Torregrosa; Federico Oppenheimer; Josep M Campistol
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Steroid-withdrawal at 3 days after renal transplantation with anti-IL-2 receptor alpha therapy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  Cornelis G ter Meulen; Iza van Riemsdijk; Ronald J Hené; Maarten H L Christiaans; George F Borm; Teun van Gelder; Luuk B Hilbrands; Willem Weimar; Andries J Hoitsma
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Mycophenolate mofetil-based, cyclosporine-free induction and maintenance immunosuppression: first-3-months analysis of efficacy and safety in two cohorts of renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  B Zanker; H Schneeberger; U Rothenpieler; G Hillebrand; W D Illner; I Theodorakis; M Stangl; W Land
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and management of hypertension in transplant patients.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Ellen D Burgess; James E Cooper; Andrew Z Fenves; David Goldsmith; Dianne McKay; Anita Mehrotra; Mark M Mitsnefes; Domenic A Sica; Sandra J Taler
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

3.  Managing transplant rejection in the elderly: the benefits of less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens.

Authors:  Kristian Heldal; Karsten Midtvedt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.