Literature DB >> 9678293

Measurements and day-to-day variabilities of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Y F Nosir1, M H Lequin, J D Kasprzak, R T van Domburg, W B Vletter, J Yao, J Stoker, F J Ten Cate, J R Roelandt.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess day-to-day variability of left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) calculated from 3-dimensional echocardiography (3-DE) and to compare the reproducibility of the measurement with magnetic resonance imaging. Forty-six subjects were examined including 15 normal volunteers (group A) and 31 patients with LV dysfunction (group B). Precordial 3-DE acquisition was performed at 2 degrees rotational intervals and repeated 1 week later. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 0.5 T. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes were derived using Simpson's rule by manual endocardial tracing of 8 equidistant parallel LV short-axis slices with 3-DE, whereas 9-mm slices were used with magnetic resonance imaging. The mean +/- SD of end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes (ml) and EF (%) from magnetic resonance imaging were 182 +/- 75, 121 +/- 76, and 39 +/- 18, whereas those from 3-DE were 182 +/- 76, 121 +/- 77, and 39 +/- 18 respectively. Day-to-day measurements of end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes, and EF on 3-DE were not significantly different as assessed with SEE (2.7, 1.1, and 2.4, respectively). Intra- and interobserver SEE for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes and EF for magnetic resonance imaging were 6.3, 4.7, and 2.1 and 13.6, 11.5, and 4.7, respectively, whereas those for 3-DE were 3.1, 4.4, and 2.2 and 6.2, 3.8, and 3.6, respectively. Day-to-day variability of LV volume and EF calculation on 3-DE were small and not significantly different for normal and dysfunctional left ventricles. Observer variabilities of 3-DE were fewer than those of magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, 3-DE is recommended for serial assessment of LV volume and EF in normal and abnormally shaped ventricles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9678293     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00306-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates.

Authors:  O Rodevan; R Bjornerheim; M Ljosland; J Maehle; H J Smith; H Ihlen
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

2.  Day-to-day variability of global left ventricular functional and perfusional measurements by quantitative gated SPECT using Tc-99m tetrofosmin in patients with heart failure due to coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Olivier De Winter; Pieter De Bondt; Christophe Van De Wiele; Guy De Backer; Rudi A Dierckx; Johan De Sutter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Novel techniques for assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Sonal Chandra; Hicham Skali; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Reliability of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT for the reproducible evaluation of resting left ventricular functional parameters in long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Valentina Berti; Sabrina Genovese; Alberto Pupi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Comprehensive First-Line Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Hypertension: Experience From a Single-Center Tertiary Referral Clinic.

Authors:  Amy E Burchell; Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Max Charalambos; Laura E K Ratcliffe; Emma C Hart; Julian F R Paton; Andreas Baumbach; Nathan E Manghat; Angus K Nightingale
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Ultrasound imaging versus morphopathology in cardiovascular diseases: the heart failure.

Authors:  Giorgio Baroldi; Riccardo Bigi; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients eligible for ICD therapy: Discrepancy between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 2D echocardiography.

Authors:  S de Haan; K de Boer; J Commandeur; A M Beek; A C van Rossum; C P Allaart
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Function-For the Neonatologist and Pediatric Intensivist.

Authors:  Cécile Tissot; Yogen Singh; Nicole Sekarski
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Assessment of left ventricular mass and volumes by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with or without wall motion abnormalities: comparison against cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A-C Pouleur; J-B le Polain de Waroux; A Pasquet; B L Gerber; O Gérard; P Allain; J-L J Vanoverschelde
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Assessment of left ventricular function by three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Boudewijn J Krenning; Marco M Voormolen; Jos R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 2.062

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.