Literature DB >> 9677628

Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis in finishing swine raised in different production systems in North Carolina, USA.

P R Davies1, W E Morrow, J Deen, H R Gamble, S Patton.   

Abstract

We compared the seroprevalence of both Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis in finishing pigs raised in different production systems in North Carolina, USA. Farms were either finishing sites using all-in/all-out management of buildings in multiple-site systems (14 farms) or farrow-to-finish systems using continuous-flow management of finishing barns or outdoor accommodation 14 farms). The two groups of herds differed with respect to several management variables. A total of 13 of 2238 samples (0.58%) were positive for antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii using the modified agglutination test. Of these, 12 were from 63 pigs sampled on a farm where finishing pigs were kept on pasture. Only one of 1752 (0.057%) samples from pigs kept in total confinement systems was seropositive. Only one pig of 2183 (0.046%) tested positive by ELISA for antibodies against T. spiralis. In this region, management practices in modern production systems appear to be adequate to virtually eliminate the risk of infection of finishing pigs with both T. gondii and T. spiralis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9677628     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00072-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  4 in total

1.  Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Iberian pig sows.

Authors:  Alba Pablos-Tanarro; Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora; Antonio Palomo; Francisco Casasola; Ignacio Ferre
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 2.  Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans.

Authors:  A M Tenter; A R Heckeroth; L M Weiss
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.981

3.  Descriptive network analysis of a Standardbred horse training facility contact network: Implications for disease transmission.

Authors:  Tanya M Rossi; Rachael M Milwid; Alison Moore; Terri L O'Sullivan; Amy L Greer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 4.  Reviewing the risk of feed as a vehicle for swine pathogen transmission.

Authors:  Cassandra K Jones; Jason Woodworth; Steve S Dritz; Chad B Paulk
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.