Literature DB >> 9676864

Comparative carbon dioxide output through injured and noninjured peritoneum during laparoscopic procedures.

T Kazama1, K Ikeda, Y Sanjo.   

Abstract

Tension pneumoperitoneum may force gas into a small injured vessel if the opening is kept patent by surrounding tissues. However, the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) that penetrates through injured or noninjured peritoneum has not been systematically determined. In 25 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic ultrasonography and cholecystectomy, CO2 output (VCO2) and O2 uptake (VO2) were measured at baseline and during anesthesia, pneumoperitoneum, laparoscopic surgical procedure (Surgery), and after hemostasis of the surgical field (Postsurgery). Before anesthesia, VCO2/BSA and VO2/BSA were 97.7 +/- 11.3 and 116.0 +/- 10.0 ml x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively. During anesthesia, they fell to 72.3 +/- 6.0 and 89.8 +/- 7.6 ml x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively (p < 0.05). VCO2/BSA increased to 96.0 +/- 11.1 at pneumoperitoneum (p < 0.05) and increased further to 126.1 +/- 11.0 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) at Surgery. It fell to 111.7 +/- 10.9 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) Postsurgery. VO2/BSA remained unchanged during pneumoperitoneum. Minute volume increased from 2.24 +/- 0.20 in anesthesia to 2.89 +/- 0.25, 4.01 +/- 0.32, and 3.46 +/- 0.28 L x min(-1) x m(-2) during pneumoperitoneum, Surgery, and Postsurgery, respectively, to maintain PaCO2. We conclude that the amount of CO2 absorbed following pneumoperitoneum prior to surgery is lower than that during Surgery or Postsurgery. The amount of CO2 absorbed through the surgical field was 2.3 times higher than that through the nonsurgical field while that from the peritoneum after hemostasis of surgical field was 1.6 times higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9676864     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007461726084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  15 in total

1.  A small bypass mixing chamber for monitoring metabolic rate and anesthetic uptake: the bymixer.

Authors:  Y Sanjo; K Ikeda
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-10

2.  Laparoscopy--an investigation during spontaneous ventilation with halothane.

Authors:  D G Lewis; W Ryder; N Burn; J T Wheldon; D Tacchi
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference during laparoscopy. Magnitude and effect of anaesthetic technique.

Authors:  W J Brampton; R J Watson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  [Pulmonary CO2 elimination in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical study].

Authors:  H Wurst; H Schulte-Steinberg; U Finsterer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Oxygen uptake, plasma catecholamines and cardiac output during neurolept-nitrous oxide and halothane anaesthesias.

Authors:  B Brismar; G Hedenstierna; R Lundh; L Tokics
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Effectors of hypercarbia during experimental pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  T Leighton; N Pianim; S Y Liu; M Kono; S Klein; F Bongard
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Pressure-volume relationships in the lung during laparoscopy.

Authors:  G B Drummond; L V Martin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Hypercarbia during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  S D Fitzgerald; C H Andrus; L J Baudendistel; T E Dahms; D L Kaminski
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C M Wittgen; C H Andrus; S D Fitzgerald; L J Baudendistel; T E Dahms; D L Kaminski
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-08

10.  [Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of cholecystectomies performed under laparoscopy].

Authors:  G Breton; E Poulin; C Fortin; J Mamazza; J Robert
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1991
View more
  1 in total

1.  In vitro performance of prefilled CO₂ absorbers with the Aisys®.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Simon P A J De Ridder; Alexander Dehouwer; Rik Carette; Sofie De Cooman; Andre M De Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.