Literature DB >> 9676676

Reviewing the reviews: the example of chronic fatigue syndrome.

J Joyce1, S Rabe-Hesketh, S Wessely.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the selection of literature in review articles is unsystematic and is influenced by the authors' discipline and country of residence. DATA SOURCES: Reviews in English published between 1980 and March 1996 in MEDLINE, EMBASE (BIDS), PSYCHLIT, and Current Contents were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Reviews of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) were selected. Articles explicitly concerned with a specialty aspect of CFS and unattributed, unreferenced, or insufficiently referenced articles were discarded. DATA EXTRACTION: Record of data sources in each review was noted as was the departmental specialty of the first author and his or her country of residence. The references cited in each index paper were tabulated by assigning them to 6 specialty categories, by article title, and by assigning them to 8 categories, by country of journal publication. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 89 reviews, 3 (3.4%) reported on literature search and described search method. Authors from laboratory-based disciplines preferentially cited laboratory references, while psychiatry-based disciplines preferentially cited psychiatric literature (P = .01). A total of 71.6% of references cited by US authors were from US journals, while 54.9% of references cited by United Kingdom authors were published in United Kingdom journals (P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Citation of the literature is influenced by review authors' discipline and nationality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9676676     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.3.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  8 in total

1.  Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence.

Authors:  S Sauerland; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The reference: more than a buttress of the scientific edifice.

Authors:  G D Schott
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views.

Authors:  Mabel Chew; Elmer V Villanueva; Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?

Authors:  S Goldbeck-Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

5.  Dealing with publication bias in translational stroke research.

Authors:  Shimin Liu
Journal:  J Exp Stroke Transl Med       Date:  2009

6.  Frequency and content analysis of chronic fatigue syndrome in medical text books.

Authors:  Leonard A Jason; Erin Paavola; Nicole Porter; Morgan L Morello
Journal:  Aust J Prim Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.307

Review 7.  Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Chronic fatigue syndrome in an ethnically diverse population: the influence of psychosocial adversity and physical inactivity.

Authors:  Kamaldeep S Bhui; Sokratis Dinos; Deborah Ashby; James Nazroo; Simon Wessely; Peter D White
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.