Literature DB >> 20431704

Dealing with publication bias in translational stroke research.

Shimin Liu1.   

Abstract

Publication bias has been around for about 50 years. It has become a concern for almost 20 years in the medical research community. This review briefly summarizes the current status of publication bias, potential sources where bias may arise from, and its common evaluation methods. In the field of translational stroke research, publication bias has long been suspected; however, it has not been addressed with sufficient efforts. Its status has remained the same during the last decade. The author emphasizes the important role that publishers might play in addressing publication bias.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20431704      PMCID: PMC2860750          DOI: 10.6030/1939-067x-2.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Stroke Transl Med        ISSN: 1939-067X


  51 in total

Review 1.  Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Authors:  A J Sutton; F Song; S M Gilbody; K R Abrams
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Submissions, impact factor, reviewer's recommendations and geographical bias within the peer review system (1997-2002): focus on Germany.

Authors:  Tobias Opthof; Ruben Coronel; Michiel J Janse
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.

Authors:  Yoav Littner; Francis B Mimouni; Shaul Dollberg; Dror Mandel
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2005-11

Review 4.  Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Silvia Palma; Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board.

Authors:  Richard Hall; Cecilia de Antueno; Adam Webber
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Minimizing the three stages of publication bias.

Authors:  T C Chalmers; C S Frank; D Reitman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Ian Roberts; Emily Sena; Philipa Wheble; Catherine Briscoe; Peter Sandercock; Malcolm Macleod; Luciano E Mignini; Pradeep Jayaram; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-15

8.  Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.

Authors:  Anton K Formann
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 9.  Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?

Authors:  S Goldbeck-Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

Review 10.  Hypothermia in animal models of acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Bart van der Worp; Emily S Sena; Geoffrey A Donnan; David W Howells; Malcolm R Macleod
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  5 in total

1.  A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.

Authors:  Story C Landis; Susan G Amara; Khusru Asadullah; Chris P Austin; Robi Blumenstein; Eileen W Bradley; Ronald G Crystal; Robert B Darnell; Robert J Ferrante; Howard Fillit; Robert Finkelstein; Marc Fisher; Howard E Gendelman; Robert M Golub; John L Goudreau; Robert A Gross; Amelie K Gubitz; Sharon E Hesterlee; David W Howells; John Huguenard; Katrina Kelner; Walter Koroshetz; Dimitri Krainc; Stanley E Lazic; Michael S Levine; Malcolm R Macleod; John M McCall; Richard T Moxley; Kalyani Narasimhan; Linda J Noble; Steve Perrin; John D Porter; Oswald Steward; Ellis Unger; Ursula Utz; Shai D Silberberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Translational Block in Stroke: A Constructive and "Out-of-the-Box" Reappraisal.

Authors:  Athanasios Lourbopoulos; Iordanis Mourouzis; Christodoulos Xinaris; Nefeli Zerva; Konstantinos Filippakis; Angelos Pavlopoulos; Constantinos Pantos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katharina F Mueller; Matthias Briel; Daniel Strech; Joerg J Meerpohl; Britta Lang; Edith Motschall; Viktoria Gloy; Francois Lamontagne; Dirk Bassler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Leisure Time Physical Activity Reduces the Risk for Stroke in Adults: A Reanalysis of a Meta-Analysis Using the Inverse-Heterogeneity Model.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-02

5.  Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries.

Authors:  Philip Marcus Sinnett; Branden Carr; Gregory Cook; Halie Mucklerath; Laura Varney; Matt Weiher; Vadim Yerokhin; Matt Vassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.