Literature DB >> 9674673

Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population.

T Mantzikos1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the facial profile preferences in a sample of 2651 randomly selected panelists (mean age, 29.3 +/- 10.1 years) from Japanese cultural and educational backgrounds. Five facial profile types were computer-generated by an orthodontist to represent distinct facial types. Subjects were asked to rank the profiles in descending order of attractiveness. The ranking was as follows: orthognathic profile, bimaxillary retrusive profile, bimaxillary protrusive profile, mandibular retrognathic profile, and mandibular prognathic profile. The differences in rank scores between all the profile types were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9674673     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70230-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  Perception of Aesthetics by Different Professionals of Different Communities.

Authors:  Amit Pratap Majethia; Vaishali Devidas Vadgaonkar; Kiran Jayant Deshpande; Parag Vishnu Gangurde
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

2.  Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mousavi; Parinaz Saeidi Ghorani; Arash Deilamani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-24

Review 3.  Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Nemetz Bronfman; Guilherme Janson; Arnaldo Pinzan; Thais Lima Rocha
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

4.  Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.

Authors:  M G Bozkir; P Karakas; O Oguz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Esthetic perception of orthodontic appliances by Brazilian children and adolescents.

Authors:  Deise Caldas Kuhlman; Tatiana Araújo de Lima; Candice Belchior Duplat; Jonas Capelli
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

6.  Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.

Authors:  Marina Detoni Vieira de Oliveira; Bruno Lopes da Silveira; Cláudia Trindade Mattos; Mariana Marquezan
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

7.  Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Amjad Al Taki; Amina Guidoum
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-04

8.  Facial Anthropometric Norms of the Young Iranian Population.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayat; Mahsa Shariati; Fatemeh Rajaeirad; Mir Saeed Yekaninejad; Fatemeh Momen-Heravi; Zeinab Davoudmanesh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-05-17

9.  Soft-Tissue Anthropometric Norms of Iranians with Proper Occlusion and Inter-Ethnic Norm Comparisons.

Authors:  Behnam Khosravanifard; Elham Raeisi; Fatemeh Kadkhodaei Oliadarani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-03-10

10.  The effect of western adaptation of Hispanic-Americans on their assessment of Korean facial profiles.

Authors:  Leo Toureno; Yoon-Ah Kook; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.