Literature DB >> 9673836

Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism. A case-control study.

O Lidegaard1, B Edström, S Kreiner.   

Abstract

To assess the influence of oral contraceptives (OC) on the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in young women, a 5-year case-control study including all women 15-44 years old suffering a first deep venous thrombosis or a first pulmonary embolism from all Danish hospitals, along with 1200 control subjects during the period 1994-1995, was conducted. Of 586 patient and 1200 control subject questionnaires sent out, 523 patient (89.2%) and 1074 control (89.5%) questionnaires were returned with an agreement to participate. After exclusion of women with nonvalid diagnoses, women who were pregnant, and women with previous VTE or acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 375 patients and 1041 control subjects were available for analysis. Potential tested confounders included: body mass index, length of OC use, family history of VTE, AMI, or stroke, smoking habits, coagulopathies, diabetes, years of schooling, certainty of diagnosis, previous births, and treated hypertension during any pregnancy. A multivariate analysis was performed. Estrogen dose had no influence on the risk for VTE. The risk for VTE among current users of OC was primarily influenced by duration of use, with significantly decreasing odds ratios (OR) over time: < 1 year; 5.1 (3.1-8.5); 1-5 years; 2.5 (1.6-4.1); and > 5 years; 2.1 (1.5-3.1), all compared with those for nonusers of OC. This trend was still significant after adjustment for progestin types. Without adjustment for duration of use, current users of OC with second generation (levonorgestrel or norgestimate) and third generation (desogestrel or gestodene) progestins had OR of 1.8 (1.1-2.9) and 3.2 (2.3-4.4), respectively. After correction for duration of use, however, no significant differences were found between users of OC with different types of progestins. In conclusion, OC increase the risk for VTE significantly. The risk among current users of OC is primarily influenced by duration of use. No difference in risk was found according to estrogen dose, and the difference in risk between different types of progestins was not statistically significant after adjustment for duration of use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9673836     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00033-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

1.  The third generation oral contraceptive controversy. The evidence shows they are less safe than second generation pills.

Authors:  P A O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 2.  Benefits and risks of third-generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  E S Leblanc; A Laws
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Kemmeren; A Algra; D E Grobbee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 4.  Cardiovascular events associated with different combined oral contraceptives: a review of current data.

Authors:  P Hannaford
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Types of combined oral contraceptives used by US women.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Corrado De Vito; Carolina Marzuillo; Antonio Boccia; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Risk-assessment algorithm and recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients.

Authors:  Ana T Rocha; Edison F Paiva; Arnaldo Lichtenstein; Rodolfo Milani; Cyrillo Filho Cavalheiro; Francisco H Maffei
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007

8.  Progestin-only contraceptive pill use among women in the United States.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; James Trussell; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  Arterial thrombosis in young women after ovarian stimulation: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Antonio Girolami; Raffaella Scandellari; Fabiana Tezza; Dalia Paternoster; Bruno Girolami
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study.

Authors:  A van Hylckama Vlieg; F M Helmerhorst; J P Vandenbroucke; C J M Doggen; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.