Literature DB >> 9673668

An efficient method for correcting the edge artifact due to smoothing.

J M Maisog1, J Chmielowska.   

Abstract

Spatial smoothing is a common pre-processing step in the analysis of functional brain imaging data. It can increase sensitivity to signals of specific shapes and sizes (Rosenfeld and Kak [1982]: Digital Picture Processing, vol. 2. Orlando, Fla.: Academic; Worsley et al. [1996]: Hum Brain Mapping 4:74-90). Also, some amount of spatial smoothness is required if methods from the theory of Gaussian random fields are to be used (Holmes [1994]: Statistical Issues in Functional Brain Mapping. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow). Smoothing is most often implemented as a convolution of the imaging data with a smoothing kernel, and convolution is most efficiently performed using the Convolution Theorem and the Fast Fourier Transform (Cooley and Tukey [1965]: Math Comput 19:297-301; Priestly [1981]: Spectral Analysis and Time Series. San Diego: Academic; Press et al. [1992]: Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). An undesirable side effect of smoothing is an artifact along the edges of the brain, where brain voxels become smoothed with non-brain voxels. This results in a dark rim which might be mistaken for hypoactivity. In this short methodological paper, we present a method for correcting functional brain images for the edge artifact due to smoothing, while retaining the use of the Convolution Theorem and the Fast Fourier Transform for efficient calculation of convolutions.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9673668      PMCID: PMC6873362     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  12 in total

1.  A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain.

Authors:  K J Worsley; A C Evans; S Marrett; P Neelin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Searching scale space for activation in PET images.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Analysis of single-subject data sets with a low number of PET scans.

Authors:  J Chmielowska; J M Maisog; M Hallett
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change.

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith; P F Liddle; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images.

Authors:  R P Woods; S R Cherry; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Unified deadtime correction model for PET.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; R E Carson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Enhanced detection of focal brain responses using intersubject averaging and change-distribution analysis of subtracted PET images.

Authors:  P T Fox; M A Mintun; E M Reiman; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  A comparison of approaches to the statistical analysis of [15O]H2O PET cognitive activation studies.

Authors:  S Arndt; T Cizadlo; N C Andreasen; G Zeien; G Harris; D S O'Leary; G L Watkins; L L Ponto; R D Hichwa
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.198

9.  Analysis of individual positron emission tomography activation maps by detection of high signal-to-noise-ratio pixel clusters.

Authors:  J B Poline; B M Mazoyer
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector positron camera by integral transformation of the projections.

Authors:  M Bergström; L Eriksson; C Bohm; G Blomqvist; J Litton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Flip-flop pharmacokinetics--delivering a reversal of disposition: challenges and opportunities during drug development.

Authors:  Jaime A Yáñez; Connie M Remsberg; Casey L Sayre; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2011-05

2.  Developmental changes in functional brain networks from birth through adolescence.

Authors:  Elveda Gozdas; Scott K Holland; Mekibib Altaye
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Special surgical considerations for functional brain mapping.

Authors:  Hussein Kekhia; Laura Rigolo; Isaiah Norton; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Reducing inter-subject anatomical variation: effect of normalization method on sensitivity of functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis in auditory cortex and the superior temporal region.

Authors:  Amir M Tahmasebi; Purang Abolmaesumi; Zane Z Zheng; Kevin G Munhall; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Training Efficiency and Transfer Success in an Extended Real-Time Functional MRI Neurofeedback Training of the Somatomotor Cortex of Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Tibor Auer; Renate Schweizer; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Empirical validation of statistical parametric mapping for group imaging of fast neural activity using electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  B Packham; G Barnes; G Sato Dos Santos; K Aristovich; O Gilad; A Ghosh; T Oh; D Holder
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Higher-order Brain Areas Associated with Real-time Functional MRI Neurofeedback Training of the Somato-motor Cortex.

Authors:  Tibor Auer; Wan Ilma Dewiputri; Jens Frahm; Renate Schweizer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.590

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.