Literature DB >> 9671714

The exocyclic groups of DNA modulate the affinity and positioning of the histone octamer.

M Buttinelli1, A Minnock, G Panetta, M Waring, A Travers.   

Abstract

To investigate the nature of the chemical determinants in DNA required for nonspecific binding and bending by proteins we have created a novel DNA in which inosine-5-methylcytosine and 2, 6-diaminopurine-uracil base pairs are substituted for normal base pairs in a defined DNA sequence. This procedure completely switches the patterns of the base pair H bonding and attachment of exocyclic groups. We show that this DNA binds a histone octamer more tightly than normal DNA but, surprisingly, does not alter the orientation of the sequence on the surface of the protein. However, in general, the addition or removal of DNA exocyclic groups reduces or increases, respectively, the affinity for the histone octamer. The average incremental change in binding energy for a single exocyclic group is approximately 40 J/mol. The orientation of the DNA in core nucleosomes also is sensitive to the number and nature of the exocyclic groups present. Notably, substitution with the naturally occurring cytosine analogue, 5-methylcytosine, shifts the preferred rotational position by 3 bp, whereas incorporating 2,6-diaminopurine shifts it 2 bp in the opposite direction. These manipulations potentially would alter the accessibility of a protein recognition sequence on the surface of the histone octamer. We propose that exocyclic groups impose steric constraints on protein-induced DNA wrapping and are also important in determining the orientation of DNA on a protein surface. In addition, we consider the implications of the selection of A-T and G-C base pairs in natural DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9671714      PMCID: PMC21112          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  Analysis of local helix geometry in three B-DNA decamers and eight dodecamers.

Authors:  K Yanagi; G G Privé; R E Dickerson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Analysis of local helix bending in crystal structures of DNA oligonucleotides and DNA-protein complexes.

Authors:  M A Young; G Ravishanker; D L Beveridge; H M Berman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Propeller-twisting of base-pairs and the conformational mobility of dinucleotide steps in DNA.

Authors:  M A el Hassan; C R Calladine
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  B-DNA twisting correlates with base-pair morphology.

Authors:  A A Gorin; V B Zhurkin; W K Olson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-03-17       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Localized DNA flexibility contributes to target site selection by DNA-bending proteins.

Authors:  A Grove; A Galeone; L Mayol; E P Geiduschek
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Helix rigidity of DNA: the meroduplex as an experimental paradigm.

Authors:  K R Hagerman; P J Hagerman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Effects of base substitutions on the binding of a DNA-bending protein.

Authors:  C Bailly; M J Waring; A A Travers
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  DNA sequence-specific reading by echinomycin: role of hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions.

Authors:  J Gallego; F J Luque; M Orozco; C Burgos; J Alvarez-Builla; M M Rodrigo; F Gago
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1994-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Expanded CTG triplet blocks from the myotonic dystrophy gene create the strongest known natural nucleosome positioning elements.

Authors:  Y H Wang; J Griffith
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  Sequence-dependent bending propensity of DNA as revealed by DNase I: parameters for trinucleotides.

Authors:  I Brukner; R Sánchez; D Suck; S Pongor
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-04-18       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  12 in total

1.  Exocyclic groups in the minor groove influence the backbone conformation of DNA.

Authors:  B Wellenzohn; W Flader; R H Winger; A Hallbrucker; E Mayer; K R Liedl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A determining influence for CpG dinucleotides on nucleosome positioning in vitro.

Authors:  Colin S Davey; Sari Pennings; Carmel Reilly; Richard R Meehan; James Allan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Mechanical properties of base-modified DNA are not strictly determined by base stacking or electrostatic interactions.

Authors:  Justin P Peters; Lauren S Mogil; Micah J McCauley; Mark C Williams; L James Maher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  DNA methylation effects on tetra-nucleosome compaction and aggregation.

Authors:  Isabel Jimenez-Useche; Nathan P Nurse; Yuqing Tian; Bhargav S Kansara; Daphne Shim; Chongli Yuan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Hepatitis delta antigen requires a flexible quasi-double-stranded RNA structure to bind and condense hepatitis delta virus RNA in a ribonucleoprotein complex.

Authors:  Brittany L Griffin; Sergey Chasovskikh; Anatoly Dritschilo; John L Casey
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Genome-wide nucleosome map and cytosine methylation levels of an ancient human genome.

Authors:  Jakob Skou Pedersen; Eivind Valen; Amhed M Vargas Velazquez; Brian J Parker; Morten Rasmussen; Stinus Lindgreen; Berit Lilje; Desmond J Tobin; Theresa K Kelly; Søren Vang; Robin Andersson; Peter A Jones; Cindi A Hoover; Alexei Tikhonov; Egor Prokhortchouk; Edward M Rubin; Albin Sandelin; M Thomas P Gilbert; Anders Krogh; Eske Willerslev; Ludovic Orlando
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Making the bend: DNA tertiary structure and protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Sabrina Harteis; Sabine Schneider
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The DNA sequence-dependence of nucleosome positioning in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Andrew Travers; Edwige Hiriart; Mark Churcher; Micaela Caserta; Ernesto Di Mauro
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2010-06

9.  Dissecting direct and indirect readout of cAMP receptor protein DNA binding using an inosine and 2,6-diaminopurine in vitro selection system.

Authors:  Søren Lindemose; Peter Eigil Nielsen; Niels Erik Møllegaard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Crop epigenetics and the molecular hardware of genotype × environment interactions.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.