Literature DB >> 9669972

Mass media antismoking campaigns: a powerful tool for health promotion.

M Siegel1.   

Abstract

Cigarette advertising and promotion have been shown to influence smoking in young persons, but the powerful effect of the mass media on behavior can also be used to promote health. Several states have earmarked a portion of their cigarette excise tax revenues to fund mass media antismoking campaigns, which have been effective in reducing cigarette consumption and in helping persons quit smoking. Despite their successes, the campaigns have been hindered by tobacco industry-supported attempts to cut their funding or restrict their scope. The most aggressive campaigns, which attack the tobacco industry and challenge social norms about tobacco use and promotion, are the most controversial but also the most effective. Mass media antismoking campaigns are a promising tool for health promotion, but only if sustained funding can be guaranteed and the development of the advertisements can be protected from intrusion by political forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9669972     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-2-199807150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  18 in total

1.  The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study.

Authors:  M Siegel; L Biener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The cigar revival and the popular press: a content analysis, 1987-1997.

Authors:  L Wenger; R Malone; L Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics.

Authors:  L Biener; G McCallum-Keeler; A L Nyman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Public health measures to reduce smoking prevalence in the UK: how many lives could be saved?

Authors:  S Lewis; D Arnott; C Godfrey; J Britton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Association of BDNF and COMT genotypes with cognitive processing of anti-smoking PSAs.

Authors:  M Falcone; C Jepson; P Sanborn; J N Cappella; C Lerman; A A Strasser
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  An academic-marketing collaborative to promote depression care: a tale of two cultures.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein; Robert A Bell; Aaron B Rochlen; Paul Duberstein; Caroline H Riby; Anthony F Caccamo; Christina K Slee; Camille S Cipri; Debora A Paterniti
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-21

7.  Disparity in smoking prevalence by education: can we reduce it?

Authors:  Shu-Hong Zhu; Kiandra Hebert; Shiushing Wong; Sharon Cummins; Anthony Gamst
Journal:  Glob Health Promot       Date:  2010-03

8.  Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think.

Authors:  Lois Biener
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The effect of cigarette smoking on musculoskeletal-related disability.

Authors:  Andrew E Lincoln; Gordon S Smith; Paul J Amoroso; Nicole S Bell
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Campaigns and cliques: variations in effectiveness of an antismoking campaign as a function of adolescent peer group identity.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; Sheila T Murphy; Steve Sussman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.