A Petry1. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine II University of Leipzig, Heart Center Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: A computer aided monitor-data processing system (CAMP-System) was developed in order to get a consistent and comprehensive database which can very precisely reflect intra-operative haemodynamic courses. The goal of the present study was to introduce a new method to scan and to gauge haemodynamic courses and to demonstrate its superiority over the traditional way of data processing based on a handwritten anaesthesia protocol. METHODS: The computerized system was applied to a study which was designed to investigate the influence of ketanserin (K) vs. urapidil (U) on haemodynamic stability during cardiac operations. Twenty male patients scheduled for myocardial revascularization received either 20 mg K or 30 mg U. Heart rate, central venous, arterial and pulmonary artery pressures were measured and on-line recorded every 20 seconds by the computer record system. In the handwritten protocol these variables were registered at eight pre-defined time points. Computerized data processing (including artifact depletion and data condensation) was compared to the results evaluated from the handwritten protocol. RESULTS: While the only significant differences in the handwritten protocol were slightly higher values of pulmonary artery pressures in group K, the computer analysis revealed a number of further differences. Higher maximum and a less stable time course of HR in group K in the pre-bypass phase and lower mean and standard deviation of MAP during cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSION: Computerized data processing including automatic artifact suppression and data condensation was able to reveal differences in the course of haemodynamic variables that cannot be detected in a conventional handwritten protocol.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: A computer aided monitor-data processing system (CAMP-System) was developed in order to get a consistent and comprehensive database which can very precisely reflect intra-operative haemodynamic courses. The goal of the present study was to introduce a new method to scan and to gauge haemodynamic courses and to demonstrate its superiority over the traditional way of data processing based on a handwritten anaesthesia protocol. METHODS: The computerized system was applied to a study which was designed to investigate the influence of ketanserin (K) vs. urapidil (U) on haemodynamic stability during cardiac operations. Twenty male patients scheduled for myocardial revascularization received either 20 mg K or 30 mg U. Heart rate, central venous, arterial and pulmonary artery pressures were measured and on-line recorded every 20 seconds by the computer record system. In the handwritten protocol these variables were registered at eight pre-defined time points. Computerized data processing (including artifact depletion and data condensation) was compared to the results evaluated from the handwritten protocol. RESULTS: While the only significant differences in the handwritten protocol were slightly higher values of pulmonary artery pressures in group K, the computer analysis revealed a number of further differences. Higher maximum and a less stable time course of HR in group K in the pre-bypass phase and lower mean and standard deviation of MAP during cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSION: Computerized data processing including automatic artifact suppression and data condensation was able to reveal differences in the course of haemodynamic variables that cannot be detected in a conventional handwritten protocol.