Literature DB >> 9667689

Individual patient data meta-analysis in cancer.

M Clarke1, L Stewart, J P Pignon, L Bijnens.   

Abstract

As in many areas of health care, treatments for cancer may differ only moderately in their effects on major end points, such as death. But, such differences are worth knowing about, particularly in common diseases in which they could represent a substantial benefit to public health. Large-scale randomized evidence allows moderate differences to be investigated reliably, and one way to achieve this is by meta-analyses of updated and centrally collected individual patient data from all relevant trials. This paper illustrates why this form of research can often be important in cancer. It also offers the first list of such projects, as a source of information on current and past research in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667689      PMCID: PMC2150346          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  22 in total

1.  Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group.

Authors:  L A Stewart; M J Clarke
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Large trial will reduce uncertainty. Steering Committee of the Big Lung Trial.

Authors:  R J Stephens; M K Parmar; R L Souhami; S Spiro
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-27

3.  Problems and suggested solutions in creating an archive of clinical trials data to permit later meta-analysis: an example of methotrexate trials in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M C Chernoff; M Wang; J J Anderson; D T Felson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1995-10

4.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  L Nyström; L E Rutqvist; S Wall; A Lindgren; M Lindqvist; S Rydén; I Andersson; N Bjurstam; G Fagerberg; J Frisell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Updated overview of the Swedish Randomized Trials on Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography: age group 40-49 at randomization.

Authors:  L G Larsson; I Andersson; N Bjurstam; G Fagerberg; J Frisell; L Tabár; L Nyström
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

6.  The effects of exercise on falls in elderly patients. A preplanned meta-analysis of the FICSIT Trials. Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques.

Authors:  M A Province; E C Hadley; M C Hornbrook; L A Lipsitz; J P Miller; C D Mulrow; M G Ory; R W Sattin; M E Tinetti; S L Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Intensification of treatment and survival in all children with lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of UK Medical Research Council trial UKALL X. Medical Research Council Working Party on Childhood Leukaemia.

Authors:  J M Chessells; C Bailey; S M Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Adjuvant chemotherapy plus tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone for postmenopausal breast cancer: meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival.

Authors:  R D Gelber; B F Cole; A Goldhirsch; C Rose; B Fisher; C K Osborne; F Boccardo; R Gray; N H Gordon; N O Bengtsson; P Sevelda
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses?

Authors:  M J Clarke; L A Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-15

10.  Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: individual patient data vs literature data.

Authors:  J P Pignon; J Bourhis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Meta-analysis of clinical studies: value for the wise or risk for harm?].

Authors:  M Baumann
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-04-15

Review 2.  Meta-analysis: A brief introduction.

Authors:  Jocelyn A Andrel; Scott W Keith; Benjamin E Leiby
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Ovarian ablation in breast cancer, 1896 to 1998: milestones along hierarchy of evidence from case report to Cochrane review.

Authors:  M J Clarke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

4.  Individual patient data meta-analysis is needed in Chinese medical research.

Authors:  Shi-Yan Yan; Li-Yun He; Bao-Yan Liu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 5.  Technical success, technique efficacy and complications of minimally-invasive imaging-guided percutaneous ablation procedures of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Mauri; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Maria Paola Fedeli; Marco Alì; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects: Personal reflections on something that is very much alive.

Authors:  Mike Clarke
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Immunotherapy Efficacy in the Initial Lines of Treatment in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamposioras; Panagiotis Ntellas; Michail Nikolaou; Theodora Germetaki; Ioanna Gazouli; Katerina Dadouli; George Zarkavelis; Anna-Lea Amylidi; Maria Tolia; Davide Mauri
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-11-16

Review 8.  Weekly versus three weeks chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Marchetti; Francesca De Felice; Angela Musella; Innocenza Palaia; Marco Monti; Daniela Musio; Ludovico Muzii; Vincenzo Tombolini; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-06

9.  Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mike Clarke
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.