Literature DB >> 9667243

Factors affecting epirubicin pharmacokinetics and toxicity: evidence against using body-surface area for dose calculation.

H P Gurney1, S Ackland, V Gebski, G Farrell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An exploratory study to test whether body-surface area (BSA) should be used for the calculation of epirubicin dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The relationship between pretreatment characteristics and the effects of epirubicin were investigated in 20 chemotherapy-naive patients. Measurements of body size, renal and hepatic function, and other factors were correlated with epirubicin pharmacokinetics (PK) and epirubicin-induced neutropenia. All patients received 150 mg of epirubicin infused continuously over 120 hours, regardless of body size. Factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate linear regression.
RESULTS: There were no correlations between BSA or weight with any PK parameter or with the degree of neutropenia. In multivariate analysis, indicators of liver function were the only factors that correlated with neutropenia and epirubicin PK. Thus, correlations for neutropenia were seen with antipyrine clearance (P = .003), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (P = .005) and serum transferrin (P = .01). Further, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for epirubicin correlated with prothrombin index (P < .01), antipyrine clearance (P < .01), and serum bile salt concentration (P = .03), and there were similar correlations for epirubicin steady-state concentration (CpSS). Epirubicin clearance correlated with antipyrine clearance (P = .02). PK parameters for dihydroepirubicin correlated with prothombin index, serum transferrin, and bile salt concentrations (P < .001 for all correlations). Because of the number of statistical examinations performed, some of these correlations may be spurious. However, some are likely to be real, since the same variables repeatedly correlated with different epirubicin-associated outcomes. There were no correlations between epirubicin PK indices or neutropenia and serum aminotransferase levels or other biochemical liver function tests, creatinine, or any of the clinical factors examined.
CONCLUSION: These results led us to question the use of BSA for epirubicin dose calculation. In contrast, quantitative liver function tests may give a better indication of drug handling and toxicity and may be useful to determine more accurate methods for dose calculation of epirubicin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667243     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  29 in total

Review 1.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Nano-advantage in enhanced drug delivery with biodegradable nanoparticles: contribution of reduced clearance.

Authors:  Rajendra S Kadam; David W A Bourne; Uday B Kompella
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Tackling the problems of tumour chemotherapy by optimal drug scheduling.

Authors:  Ambili Remesh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-05-31

4.  'Flat-fixed dosing' of chemotherapy: a concept whose time has come?

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Ignace de Hingh; Kurt Van Der Speeten; Martin Hubner; Marcello Deraco; Naoual Bakrin; Laurent Villeneuve; Shigeki Kusamura; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL Study.

Authors:  Adriana Villaseñor; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathy Baumgartner; Richard Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein; Anne McTiernan; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 8.  Body Composition and Anti-Neoplastic Treatment in Adult and Older Subjects - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  S Gérard; D Bréchemier; A Lefort; S Lozano; G Abellan Van Kan; T Filleron; L Mourey; C Bernard-Marty; M E Rougé-Bugat; V Soler; B Vellas; M Cesari; Y Rolland; L Balardy
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  Factors affecting the pharmacokinetic profile of MS-275, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Milin R Acharya; Judith E Karp; Edward A Sausville; Kyunghwa Hwang; Qin Ryan; Ivana Gojo; Jurgen Venitz; William D Figg; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of the anthracycline anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Romano Danesi; Stefano Fogli; Alessandra Gennari; Pierfranco Conte; Mario Del Tacca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.