D Phillips1, F Brooks. 1. Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One aim of the Patients' Charter initiative is to ensure that general practitioner (GP) services become more sensitive to the expressed needs of patients. Most studies in this area have concentrated on the personal and professional attributes of the GP, and few studies have explored in detail the specific views of women patients. AIM: To examine age differences in the views of women under the age of 65 years on the quality of different aspects of primary health care services. METHOD: A random sample of 1251 women aged 16-65 years was surveyed by postal questionnaire on their use of and satisfaction with primary health care services. Analyses were undertaken of women's verdicts on the best and worst aspects of the services provided. RESULTS: There is a strong inverse relationship between age and negative evaluations of primary health care services. On each of 20 items ['what are the worst things about the GP surgery?'], older women consistently scored lower than younger women. The results were not so clear-cut among the 20 positive items ('what are the best things about the GP surgery'). On nine items, there was a significant positive association with age (the highest being on 'receptionists are approachable' and 'practice nurse is approachable and easy to talk to'). On nine items, there was no significant age difference, and on the item with the highest overall positive ranking, 'not far to travel to GP surgery', the association was in the opposite direction to that expected, i.e., a larger proportion of women under 40 years of age (72.5%) answered positively than did women over the age of 40 years (64.9%). CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the relationship between age and positive evaluations of primary health care service is less straightforward than has been assumed previously. Although older women are consistently less willing to criticize primary health care services across the board, they are more discriminating in giving and withholding praise.
BACKGROUND: One aim of the Patients' Charter initiative is to ensure that general practitioner (GP) services become more sensitive to the expressed needs of patients. Most studies in this area have concentrated on the personal and professional attributes of the GP, and few studies have explored in detail the specific views of womenpatients. AIM: To examine age differences in the views of women under the age of 65 years on the quality of different aspects of primary health care services. METHOD: A random sample of 1251 women aged 16-65 years was surveyed by postal questionnaire on their use of and satisfaction with primary health care services. Analyses were undertaken of women's verdicts on the best and worst aspects of the services provided. RESULTS: There is a strong inverse relationship between age and negative evaluations of primary health care services. On each of 20 items ['what are the worst things about the GP surgery?'], older women consistently scored lower than younger women. The results were not so clear-cut among the 20 positive items ('what are the best things about the GP surgery'). On nine items, there was a significant positive association with age (the highest being on 'receptionists are approachable' and 'practice nurse is approachable and easy to talk to'). On nine items, there was no significant age difference, and on the item with the highest overall positive ranking, 'not far to travel to GP surgery', the association was in the opposite direction to that expected, i.e., a larger proportion of women under 40 years of age (72.5%) answered positively than did women over the age of 40 years (64.9%). CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the relationship between age and positive evaluations of primary health care service is less straightforward than has been assumed previously. Although older women are consistently less willing to criticize primary health care services across the board, they are more discriminating in giving and withholding praise.
Authors: Brian Hutchison; Truls Østbye; Jan Barnsley; Moira Stewart; Maria Mathews; M Karen Campbell; Eugene Vayda; Stewart B Harris; Vicki Torrance-Rynard; Christine Tyrrell Journal: CMAJ Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 8.262