Literature DB >> 9667089

The management of hypertension in the elderly by general practitioners in Merseyside: the rule of halves revisited.

M Cranney1, S Barton, T Walley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hypertension in the elderly significantly reduces cardiovascular events and confers greater absolute benefit compared with treating younger adults. However, this group has been undertreated in the past. AIM: To perform a reliable and valid multipractice audit of the current management of elderly hypertensive patients.
METHOD: An observational study conducted as multiple standardized audits in general practices. The notes of 6139 patients aged 65 years or over from 76 general practices in Merseyside were examined to determine the percentage of elderly patients who had their blood pressure recorded. The percentages of hypertensive patients who were diagnosed, treated, and controlled was also recorded.
RESULTS: Eighty-one per cent of the sample had their blood pressure recorded. Fifty-three per cent of patients over the age of 65 were identified as hypertensive; 64% of hypertensive patients are receiving antihypertensive medication and 54% of treated hypertensive patients can be considered controlled. However, very small changes in the criteria used to define blood pressure control have dramatic effects on the results. Digit preference and the number of available blood pressure recordings also significantly affect the results.
CONCLUSION: The management of hypertension in the elderly by Merseyside general practitioners (GPs) gives better results than predicted by the 'rule of halves'. Elderly hypertensive patients are more likely to be detected and treated, but only half achieve control to 160/90. The results are particularly sensitive to the degree of digit preference, the number of available recordings, and to the precise definition used for control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667089      PMCID: PMC1410051     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  30 in total

1.  Incidence of myocardial infarction in elderly men being treated with antihypertensive drugs: population based cohort study.

Authors:  J Merlo; J Ranstam; H Liedholm; B Hedblad; G Lindberg; U Lindblad; S O Isacsson; A Melander; L Råstam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-24

2.  Observational precision in general practice data: a technique for analysis and audit.

Authors:  D Wingfield
Journal:  IMA J Math Appl Med Biol       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec

3.  The risk of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  S Barton; M Cranney; J Hatcher; T Walley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Blood pressure control of drug treated hypertension in 18 general practices.

Authors:  M Aylett; P Creighton; S Jachuck; D Newrick; A Evans
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Management of hypertension in the elderly: attitudes of general practitioners and hospital physicians.

Authors:  G A Ford; M N Asghar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Interpractice audit of diagnosis and management of hypertension in primary care: educational intervention and review of medical records.

Authors:  M Mashru; A Lant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-29

7.  Case-control study of stroke and the quality of hypertension control in north west England.

Authors:  X Du; K Cruickshank; R McNamee; M Saraee; J Sourbutts; A Summers; N Roberts; E Walton; S Holmes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

8.  What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  T P Fahey; T J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

9.  The detection and management of hypertension in the elderly of Northamptonshire.

Authors:  T Fahey; T Lancaster
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-03

10.  General practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to the management of hypertension in elderly patients.

Authors:  T Fahey; C Silagy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  10 in total

1.  Performance indicators for primary care groups. Current indicators have been chosen for ease of collection rather than scientific validity.

Authors:  P Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

2.  Blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: clinical performance of general practitioners.

Authors:  B D Frijling; T H Spies; C M Lobo; M E Hulscher; B B van Drenth; J C Braspenning; A Prins; J C van der Wouden; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Antihypertensive drug prescribing in Grampian.

Authors:  Sarah Ross; Mary Joan Macleod
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Improving management of hypertension in general practice: a randomised controlled trial of feedback derived from electronic patient data.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Peter T Donnan; Graham Watt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  What benefit do patients expect from adding second and third antihypertensive drugs?

Authors:  Hannah Leaman; Peter R Jackson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Addressing barriers to change: an RCT of practice-based education to improve the management of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  M Cranney; S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  M E Seddon; M N Marshall; S M Campbell; M O Roland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

8.  Recording blood pressure readings in elderly patients' charts: what patient and physician characteristics make it more likely?

Authors:  Joel Broomfield; Nicola Schieda; Shannon M Sullivan; Larry W Chambers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Tina Karwalajtys
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Zero end-digit preference in recorded blood pressure and its impact on classification of patients for pharmacologic management in primary care - PREDICT-CVD-6.

Authors:  Joanna Broad; Sue Wells; Roger Marshall; Rod Jackson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Recording blood pressure and eGFR in primary care after the Belgrade screening study.

Authors:  Visnja Lezaic; Jelena Marinkovic; Zoran Milutinovic; Nada Jovanovic-Vasiljevic; Vesna Vujicic; Branka Pejovic; Snezana Kalabic; Ljubica Djukanovic
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.