Literature DB >> 15720929

Improving management of hypertension in general practice: a randomised controlled trial of feedback derived from electronic patient data.

Elizabeth Mitchell1, Frank Sullivan, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Peter T Donnan, Graham Watt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although absolute risk of death associated with raised blood pressure increases with age, the benefits of treatment are greater in older patients. However, fewer patients in this group are identified, treated, and controlled. AIM: To evaluate the impact of the provision of different levels of feedback on identification, treatment, and control of older patients with hypertension. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Fifty-two Scottish general practices.
METHOD: Practices were randomly allocated to either control (n = 19), audit only feedback (n = 16), or audit plus risk feedback, prioritising patients by absolute risk (n = 17). Electronic data were extracted from practice computer systems annually from 1999 to 2001 and used to develop feedback. Data were collected for 30 345 patients aged 65-79 years.
RESULTS: The majority of known patients with hypertension in each group had an initial blood pressure recorded (control = 89.6%; audit = 80.4%; risk = 96.1%) and this increased over the study period (control = 92.3%; audit = 86.0%; risk = 96.6%). Initially, more than 80% of patients in each group were treated but many were uncontrolled (blood pressure >/=160/ >/=90 mmHg) (control = 41.5%; audit = 41.3%; risk = 36.1%). The numbers of untreated and uncontrolled patients in each group reduced (control = 32.3%; audit = 38.3%; risk = 32.6%). There was some evidence of a significant difference in mean systolic pressure between the audit plus risk and audit only groups: (149.6 versus 152.7 mmHg; P = 0.019) and of significantly greater control in the audit plus risk group compared with the other groups 49.4% (versus audit only = 35.4%; versus control = 46.5%; odds ratio = 1.72 [95% confidence interval = 1.09 to 2.70]; P = 0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: Levels of identification, treatment, and control improved in each group. Although there were still significant numbers of patients with uncontrolled hypertension, there is some evidence to suggest that providing patient-specific feedback may have a positive impact on identification and management of hypertension in older people and produce an increase in control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15720929      PMCID: PMC1463214     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

1.  Who decides when to start preventive treatment? A questionnaire survey to compare the views of different population subgroups.

Authors:  D K Lewis; S Barton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Management of older patients with hypertension in primary care: improvement on the rule of halves.

Authors:  S Duggan; M P Eccles; N Steen; S Jones; G A Ford
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Hypertension--a community problem.

Authors:  J A Wilber; J G Barrow
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  A survey of computer use in Scottish primary care: general practitioners are no longer technophobic but other primary care staff need better computer access.

Authors:  Libby Morris; Jo Dumville; L Malcolm Campbell; Frank Sullivan
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2003

5.  Identification of underprivileged areas.

Authors:  B Jarman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-28

6.  Results of the STOP-Hypertension-2 trial.

Authors:  L Hansson
Journal:  Blood Press Suppl       Date:  2000

7.  A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.

Authors:  A Hassey; D Gerrett; A Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-09

8.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Relation between coronary risk and coronary mortality in women of the Renfrew and Paisley survey: comparison with men.

Authors:  C G Isles; D J Hole; V M Hawthorne; A F Lever
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. MRC Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-15
View more
  12 in total

1.  Implementing and maintaining a researchable database from electronic medical records: a perspective from an academic family medicine department.

Authors:  Moira Stewart; Amardeep Thind; Amanda L Terry; Vijaya Chevendra; J Neil Marshall
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

2.  Identifying individuals for primary cardiovascular disease prevention in UK general practice: priorities and resource implications.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths; Stephen Munday; David Stables
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  "My approach to this job is...one person at a time": Perceived discordance between population-level quality targets and patient-centred care.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Jan Barnsley; Ross Upshur; Karen Tu; Baiju Shah; Jeremy Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Trust, confidentiality, and the acceptability of sharing HIV-related patient data: lessons learned from a mixed methods study about Health Information Exchanges.

Authors:  Andre Maiorana; Wayne T Steward; Kimberly A Koester; Charles Pearson; Starley B Shade; Deepalika Chakravarty; Janet J Myers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Protocol for the 'e-Nudge trial': a randomised controlled trial of electronic feedback to reduce the cardiovascular risk of individuals in general practice [ISRCTN64828380].

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths; Stephen Munday
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Ten-Year Follow-Up of Clinical Governance Implementation in Primary Care: Improving Screening, Diagnosis and Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Authors:  Carina Aguilar Martín; Alessandra Queiroga Gonçalves; Carlos López-Pablo; José Fernández-Sáez; Emma Forcadell Drago; Zojaina Hernández Rojas; Josep Maria Pepió Vilaubí; Dolores Rodríguez Cumplido; Josep Lluis Piñol; Jordi Bladé-Creixenti; Maria Rosa Dalmau Llorca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Prescribing Data in General Practice Demonstration (PDGPD) project--a cluster randomised controlled trial of a quality improvement intervention to achieve better prescribing for chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Margaret Williamson; Magnolia Cardona-Morrell; Jeffrey D Elliott; James F Reeve; Nigel P Stocks; Jon Emery; Judith M Mackson; Jane M Gunn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  Marita S Fønhus; Therese K Dalsbø; Marit Johansen; Atle Fretheim; Helge Skirbekk; Signe A Flottorp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-11

9.  The Sandwell Project: a controlled evaluation of a programme of targeted screening for prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care.

Authors:  Tom Marshall; Paul Westerby; Jenny Chen; Mary Fairfield; Jenny Harding; Ruth Westerby; Rajai Ahmad; John Middleton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Audit-based education lowers systolic blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: the Quality Improvement in CKD (QICKD) trial results.

Authors:  Simon de Lusignan; Simon de Lusignana; Hugh Gallagher; Simon Jones; Tom Chan; Jeremy van Vlymen; Aumran Tahir; Nicola Thomas; Neerja Jain; Olga Dmitrieva; Imran Rafi; Andrew McGovern; Kevin Harris
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 10.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.