Literature DB >> 9666935

Reliability of an Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life Survey Instrument for use in the community: OPTQoL.

J M Chandler1, A R Martin, C Girman, P D Ross, B Love-McClung, E Lydick, B P Yawn.   

Abstract

A brief Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life (OPTQoL) questionnaire was previously developed as a cross-sectional survey instrument to assess the community impact of osteoporosis on quality of life in women. The initial development process involving item generation through focus groups, item reduction, and content and construct validation yielded a 36-item questionnaire with three domains (physical difficulty, adaptations and fears) and 10 health-related questions. In the present study, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire were assessed in a mail-based study with two clinical sites. Two hundred women (50 with severe osteoporosis, 50 with osteopenia, 50 with normal bone mineral density (BMD) and 50 with osteoarthritis and normal BMD), aged 43-84 years, completed the self-administered questionnaire initially and again about 2 weeks later. Using weighted kappas, agreement between questionnaire administrations ranged from 0.60 to 0.80 for most of the individual items. Intraclass correlation coefficients to assess reliability for the domain scores were 0.93 (physical difficulty), 0.82 (adaptations) and 0.88 (fears). Internal consistency of each of the domains was also high, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.91. Four items were dropped from the 36-item questionnaire due to high percentage of 'not applicable' responses. Results of the analyses support the validity and reliability of this instrument as a cross-sectional survey tool for assessing the impact of osteoporosis on quality of life in women living in the community. The questionnaire has been translated and culturally adapted into seven languages to allow cross-cultural studies of the community impact of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666935     DOI: 10.1007/BF02672508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   5.071


  12 in total

1.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

Authors:  R A Deyo; P Diehr; D L Patrick
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

2.  The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; W Rogers; A E Raczek; J F Lu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

5.  Osteoporosis in late life: does health locus of control affect psychosocial adaptation?

Authors:  D T Gold; S D Smith; C W Bales; K W Lyles; R E Westlund; M K Drezner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL).

Authors:  E Lydick; S I Zimmerman; B Yawn; B Love; M Kleerekoper; P Ross; A Martin; R Holmes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; M C Nevitt; A C Rundle; J A Cauley; S R Cummings; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  D J Cook; G H Guyatt; J D Adachi; J Clifton; L E Griffith; R S Epstein; E F Juniper
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1993-06

10.  Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status.

Authors:  K W Lyles; D T Gold; K M Shipp; C F Pieper; S Martinez; P L Mulhausen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Wilson; C A Sharp; M W J Davie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Development and validation of a specific quality of life module in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: the QUALIOST.

Authors:  P Marquis; P Cialdella; C De la Loge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Cristina S Hammond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Paul Lips; Natasja M van Schoor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Association of low general health status, measured prospectively by Euroqol EQ5D, with osteoporosis, independent of a history of prior fracture.

Authors:  Veena Dhillon; Nigel Hurst; Jim Hannan; George Nuki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  J D Adachi; G Ioannidis; L Pickard; C Berger; J C Prior; L Joseph; D A Hanley; W P Olszynski; T M Murray; T Anastassiades; W Hopman; J P Brown; S Kirkland; C Joyce; A Papaioannou; S Poliquin; A Tenenhouse; E A Papadimitropoulos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Dynamic change and influence of osteoporotic back pain with vertebral fracture on related activities and social participation: evaluating reliability and validity of a newly developed outcome measure.

Authors:  Tokuhide Doi; Masami Akai; Naoto Endo; Keiji Fujino; Tsutomu Iwaya
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Impact of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures on quality-of-life. a population-based study in Valencia, Spain (The FRAVO Study).

Authors:  José Sanfélix-Genovés; Isabel Hurtado; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; Begoña Reig-Molla; Salvador Peiró
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Quality of life in postmenopausal women with reduced bone mineral density: psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of QUALEFFO-41.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączyk; Tomasz Opala; Paweł Kleka
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.