Literature DB >> 9666906

Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes.

M L Abbott1, K L Schmid, N C Strang.   

Abstract

While the accommodation system has been implicated in myopia development, the nature of this relationship remains obscure. This study investigated the differences in accommodation stimulus response curves between adult myopes and emmetropes. Myopic subjects were classified according to age of onset and stability of their myopia. Accommodation stimulus response curves were measured using three different methods: (i) real targets presented at viewing distances of 4 m to 0.25 m, (ii) a target at 4 m viewed through negative lenses of increasing power, and (iii) a target at 0.25 m viewed through positive lenses of decreasing power. A Canon Autoref R-1 measured the accommodation responses at 5 levels of demand (increasing from 0 D to 4 D in 1 D steps). We found significant differences between the three methods used to stimulate an accommodation response in all subject groups, for example, accommodation lags at high accommodative demands were greatest for the negative lens series and least for the positive lens series. In addition, while differences between early-onset myopes, late-onset myopes and emmetropes were not observed, we did observe differences when myopic subjects were reclassified according to whether their myopia was progressing or stable. A reduced accommodation response to negative lens-induced accommodative demand was found in progressing myopes but not in stable myopes. These results provide further evidence for the link between myopia progression and inaccurate accommodation. The data also suggest that adult myopes with stable refractive errors show accommodation responses similar to that of emmetropes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  34 in total

1.  The effect of two-zone concentric bifocal spectacle lenses on refractive error development and eye growth in young chicks.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Christine Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Holly Severson; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Assessment of eye length changes in accommodation using dynamic extended-depth OCT.

Authors:  Yu-Cherng Chang; Keke Liu; Carolina de Freitas; Alex Pham; Florence Cabot; Siobhan Williams; Ethan Adre; Giovanni Gregori; Marco Ruggeri; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Accommodative stimulus-response curves to low-pass filtered natural images.

Authors:  José J Esteve-Taboada; Paula Bernal-Molina; Robert Montés-Micó; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Full-field accommodation in rhesus monkeys measured using infrared photorefraction.

Authors:  Lin He; Mark Wendt; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Accommodative Gain in Relation to Perceived Target Clarity.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.