Literature DB >> 9666828

Facial port wine stains in childhood: prediction of the rate of improvement as a function of the age of the patient, size and location of the port wine stain and the number of treatments with the pulsed dye (585 nm) laser.

C M Nguyen1, J J Yohn, C Huff, W L Weston, J G Morelli.   

Abstract

In this study we examined the rate of decrease in size of facial port wine stains (PWS) as a function of number of treatments, lesion size, lesion location and patients' age. This study was performed at the University of Colorado Hospital Outpatient Dermatology Center, Denver, U.S.A. A consecutive sample of 91 patients 18 years of age or younger with facial PWS in which the entire lesion was treated at each visit were studied. Included were all patients who had a minimum of five treatments or complete clearance of their lesion in fewer than five treatments. Patients were evaluated following one, five and 10 treatments with the pulsed (450 s) dye (585 nm) laser. Improvement was defined as the percentage decrease in the size of the PWS. For all patients, the first five treatments resulted in a mean decrease in size of 55% while the second five treatments (38 patients) only improved the mean decrease in size by 18%. Grouped by location, the mean decreases in size from the first five and the second five treatments were as follows: central forehead = 100%, 0%; peripheral face = 58%, 28%; central face = 48%, 14%; and mixed (combination of peripheral and central face) = 21%, 9%. All central forehead PWS completely cleared within five treatments while none of the mixed PWS did so even with an average of 14 treatments. Grouped by size, mean decrease in size was highest for small lesions; < 20 cm2 = 67%, 21%; 20 to < 40 cm2 = 45%, 8%; and > 40 cm2 = 23%, 29%. Grouped by age, mean decrease in size was highest for young children: < 1-year-old = 63%, 33%; 1 to < 6 years = 48%, 15%; and older than 6 years = 54%, 10%. For all patients studied, maximal improvement was obtained in the first five treatments. Major determinants of treatment response in order of decreasing importance are PWS location, size and patients' age. The most successful responses are seen in young patients (less than 1 year old) with small PWS (under 20 cm2) that are located over bony areas of the face such as the central forehead. These three determinants may be useful tools to guide patient expectations and to predict the rate of improvement of PWS to pulsed dye laser treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666828     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02219.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  18 in total

Review 1.  An overview of clinical and experimental treatment modalities for port wine stains.

Authors:  Jennifer K Chen; Pedram Ghasri; Guillermo Aguilar; Anne Margreet van Drooge; Albert Wolkerstorfer; Kristen M Kelly; Michal Heger
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Pulsed dye laser double-pass treatment of patients with resistant capillary malformations.

Authors:  Ratna Rajaratnam; Sharyn A Laughlin; Denis Dudley
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  [Potential and limitations of dye laser therapy for capillary malformations].

Authors:  A Klein; U Hohenleutner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Clinical experience in the treatment of port-wine stains with blebs.

Authors:  Hyung Rae Lee; Tae Young Han; Young-Gull Kim; June Hyunkyung Lee
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  Does interval time between pulsed dye laser treatments for port-wine stains influence outcome? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor Snast; Moshe Lapidoth; Ran Kaftory; Adi Nosrati; Emmilia Hodak; Daniel Mimouni; Efrat Solomon-Cohen; Assi Levi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Lasers for cutaneous congenital vascular lesions: a comprehensive overview and update.

Authors:  Katlein França; Anna Chacon; Jennifer Ledon; Jessica Savas; Jan Izakovic; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Response to Laser Treatment of Café au Lait Macules Based on Morphologic Features.

Authors:  Daniel A Belkin; Julia P Neckman; Hana Jeon; Paul Friedman; Roy G Geronemus
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  Use of reflectance spectrophotometry to predict the response of port wine stains to pulsed dye laser.

Authors:  Shlomit Halachmi; Ron Azaria; Roy Inbar; Dean Ad-El; Moshe Lapidoth
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 9.  Port wine stain progression: a potential consequence of delayed and inadequate treatment?

Authors:  Kira Minkis; Roy G Geronemus; Elizabeth K Hale
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Japanese clinical practice guidelines for vascular anomalies 2017.

Authors:  Hidefumi Mimura; Sadanori Akita; Akihiro Fujino; Masatoshi Jinnin; Mine Ozaki; Keigo Osuga; Hiroki Nakaoka; Eiichi Morii; Akira Kuramochi; Yoko Aoki; Yasunori Arai; Noriko Aramaki; Masanori Inoue; Yuki Iwashina; Tadashi Iwanaka; Shigeru Ueno; Akihiro Umezawa; Michio Ozeki; Junko Ochi; Yoshiaki Kinoshita; Masakazu Kurita; Shien Seike; Nobuyuki Takakura; Masataka Takahashi; Takao Tachibana; Kumiko Chuman; Shuji Nagata; Mitsunaga Narushima; Yasunari Niimi; Shunsuke Nosaka; Taiki Nozaki; Kazuki Hashimoto; Ayato Hayashi; Satoshi Hirakawa; Atsuko Fujikawa; Yumiko Hori; Kentaro Matsuoka; Hideki Mori; Yuki Yamamoto; Shunsuke Yuzuriha; Naoaki Rikihisa; Shoji Watanabe; Shinichi Watanabe; Tatsuo Kuroda; Shunsuke Sugawara; Kosuke Ishikawa; Satoru Sasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.