Literature DB >> 9666764

Bladder neck strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: still an unsolved problem.

W Tomschi1, G Suster, W Höltl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors responsible for anastomotic strictures of the bladder neck after radical retropubic prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 239 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1987 and 1996, 36 (15%) developed anastomotic strictures after surgery. The influence of tumour stage, previous prostatic surgery, urinary extravasation and postoperative bacteriuria were assessed.
RESULTS: In 21 patients (58%), the bladder neck stricture occurred within 3 months of surgery, in 11 (30%) at 4-12 months after surgery and in four (11%) more than 12 months after surgery; three of these also had local recurrence. Advanced tumour stage and positive margins did not correlate with a higher stricture rate, nor was there a significant difference in stricture rates with three or four anastomotic sutures. However, extravasation at the time of catheter removal (16 of 36 patients (44%) with vs 34 of 183 patients without (19%) stricture, bacteriuria of > 10(6) c.f.u./mL at the time of catheter removal (stricture group 21 of 36 patients (58%) stricture with vs 71 of 203 (35%) without) and previous prostatic surgery (TURP or open surgery, stricture in 28% of those previously operated vs 13% with no previous surgery) were significant risk factors.
CONCLUSION: There are three risk factors for anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy: previous operations on the prostate, extravasation and asymptomatic bacteriuria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666764     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00660.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  12 in total

Review 1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The case for open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nadeem Shaida; Peter R Malone
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  An update on best practice in the diagnosis and management of post-prostatectomy anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Nicholas R Rocco; Jack M Zuckerman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-04-11

3.  Urethral Strictures and Stenoses Caused by Prostate Therapy.

Authors:  Mang L Chen; Andres F Correa; Richard A Santucci
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

Review 4.  Management of the complications of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Penner Schraudenbach; Carlos E Bermejo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Post-operative drain output as a predictor of bladder neck contracture following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory R Hanson; Erin Odom; Lester S Borden; Nancy Neil; John M Corman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Transperineal reanastomosis for the treatment for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures as a last option before urinary diversion.

Authors:  Christoph Philip Reiss; Daniel Pfalzgraf; Luis Alex Kluth; Armin Soave; Margit Fisch; Roland Dahlem
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  [Stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  V Beck; M Apfelbeck; M Chaloupka; A Kretschmer; F Strittmatter; S Tritschler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Post-radical-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: the management of concomitant bladder neck contracture.

Authors:  Thomas King; Y Zaki Almallah
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04-26

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of bladder neck contracture after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hee Ju Cho; Tae Young Jung; Duk Yoon Kim; Seok Soo Byun; Dong Deuk Kwon; Tae Hee Oh; Woo Jin Ko; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-05-14

10.  Bladder neck incision using a 70 W 2 micron continuous wave laser (RevoLix).

Authors:  Thorsten Bach; Thomas R W Herrmann; Christian Cellarius; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.