Literature DB >> 9663912

Reproducibility and clinical value of nocturnal hypotension: prospective evidence from the SAMPLE study. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation.

S Omboni1, G Parati, P Palatini, A Vanasia, M L Muiesan, C Cuspidi, G Mancia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether modifications in the nighttime blood pressure fall caused by antihypertensive treatment predict the regression of end-organ damage of hypertension.
METHODS: The analysis was performed in patients with essential hypertension and echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy involved in the SAMPLE study. For each patient, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass index were performed at the end of a 4-week wash-out pretreatment period, after 3 and 12 months of treatment with lisinopril or with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and after a final 4-week placebo period. For each ambulatory blood pressure monitoring the 24 h average, daytime average (0600-2400 h), night-time average (2400-0600 h) and day-night difference was computed. The percentages of dipper and non-dipper patients (i.e. the patients with night blood pressure falls greater and less than 10% of the daytime average, respectively) were also computed.
RESULTS: The reproducibility of the day-night difference was low, both for comparison of the pretreatment and final placebo periods (n = 170) and for comparison of the third and the 12th month of treatment (n = 180). The reproducibility of the dipper-non-dipper dichotomy was also low, 35-40% of patients becoming non-dippers if they were dippers and vice versa, both with and without treatment The changes in left ventricular mass index after 12 months of treatment were significantly (P<0.01) related to the changes in 24 h, daytime and night-time blood pressure (r always > 0.33), but this was not the case for the treatment-induced modification of the day-night difference (r= -0.03 and -0.008 for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that day-night blood pressure changes and the classification of patients into dippers and non-dippers are poorly reproducible over time. It also provides the first prospective evidence that treatment-induced changes in day-night blood pressure difference are not related to treatment-induced regression of left ventricular mass index, thus having a limited clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663912     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199816060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  29 in total

Review 1.  Guiding antihypertensive treatment decisions using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is related to albuminuria variability and progression in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Noshad; M Mousavizadeh; M Mozafari; M Nakhjavani; A Esteghamati
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Renal resistive index and nocturnal non-dipping: is there an association in essential hypertension?

Authors:  Baris Afsar; Nurhan F Ozdemir; Rengin Elsurer; Siren Sezer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Behavior of the night decrease of arterial pressure after suppression controlled of the antihypertensive medication].

Authors:  F Villalba Alcalá; A Espino Montoro; C Alvarez Lacayo; A Cayuela Domínguez; M C González Fernández; J M López Chozas
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 5.  Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  John W Graves; Mohammed Mahdi Althaf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 6.  Nighttime blood pressure: a target for therapy?

Authors:  Bernard Waeber; Jean-Jacques Mourad; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Clinical correlates of ambulatory BP monitoring among patients with CKD.

Authors:  Satoshi Iimuro; Enyu Imai; Tsuyoshi Watanabe; Kosaku Nitta; Tadao Akizawa; Seiichi Matsuo; Hirofumi Makino; Yasuo Ohashi; Akira Hishida
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Long-term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure is superior to office blood pressure in the very elderly.

Authors:  P Campbell; N Ghuman; D Wakefield; L Wolfson; W B White
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Decreased orthostatic adrenergic reactivity in non-dipping postural tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  Juan J Figueroa; Darlene M Bott-Kitslaar; Joaquin A Mercado; Jeffrey R Basford; Paola Sandroni; Win-Kuang Shen; David M Sletten; Tonette L Gehrking; Jade A Gehrking; Phillip A Low; Wolfgang Singer
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.145

10.  A 15-year longitudinal study on ambulatory blood pressure tracking from childhood to early adulthood.

Authors:  Zhibin Li; Harold Snieder; Gregory A Harshfield; Frank A Treiber; Xiaoling Wang
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.