Literature DB >> 18807207

Renal resistive index and nocturnal non-dipping: is there an association in essential hypertension?

Baris Afsar1, Nurhan F Ozdemir, Rengin Elsurer, Siren Sezer.   

Abstract

Renal Doppler ultrasonography (RDU) is a useful method to determine renal resistive index (RRI). The RRI has been used to evaluate target organ damage (TOD) in essential hypertension. Nocturnal non-dipping of blood pressure (BP) in essential hypertension was also associated with TOD. The relationship between increased RRI and non-dipping has not been specifically studied before. Patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, biochemistry analysis, 24-h urine testing, and RDU. Totally, 198 patients (137 women, 61 men, aged 53.8 +/- 11.4 years) were included. Sixty-two patients were non-dippers, and 56 patients had increased RRI. RRI was increased in 32.3% of non-dipper patients and in 26.5% of dipper patients (P = 0.402). The RRIs of dippers were lower than the RRIs of non-dippers (0.65 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.07, P = 0.036). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of potential factors predicting increased RRI disclosed that advanced age (OR 1.090, CI 1.042-1.140, P < 0.0001) and increased pulse pressure (OR 1.037, CI 1.012-1.062, P = 0.004) were independently associated with increased RRI. In multivariate linear regression analysis, using the same independent variables, we found that square root-transformed RRI was independently associated with age (Beta + 0.366, P < 0.0001) and pulse pressure (Beta + 0.222, P = 0.001). Increased RRI and nocturnal non-dipping are not independently associated with each other in newly diagnosed essential hypertensive patients. Possible different mechanisms, or the same mechanisms but with different activation levels, may be responsible for the increased RRI and non-dipping as discrete pathologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18807207     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9455-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  36 in total

1.  A decrease in diastolic blood pressure combined with an increase in systolic blood pressure is associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality in men.

Authors:  A Benetos; M Zureik; J Morcet; F Thomas; K Bean; M Safar; P Ducimetière; L Guize
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Thomas Pickering; Roland Asmar; Martin Myers; Gianfranco Parati; Jan Staessen; Thomas Mengden; Yutaka Imai; Bernard Waeber; Paolo Palatini; William Gerin
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Validation of the OSCAR 2 oscillometric 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices.

Authors:  Stephen C Jones; Mary Bilous; Sue Winship; Paul Finn; James Goodwin
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  24 h blood pressure profile affects the left ventricle independently of the pressure level. A study in untreated essential hypertension diagnosed by office blood pressure readings.

Authors:  N Zakopoulos; S Stamatelopoulos; S Toumanidis; N Saridakis; C Trika; S Moulopoulos
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Variability of Doppler parameters in the healthy kidney: an anatomic-physiologic correlation.

Authors:  R Knapp; A Plötzeneder; F Frauscher; G Helweg; W Judmaier; D zur Nedden; W Recheis; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart Disease? The Framingham heart study.

Authors:  S S Franklin; S A Khan; N D Wong; M G Larson; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Clinical usefulness of duplex ultrasonography for the assessment of renal arteriosclerosis in essential hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Y Shimizu; T Itoh; H Hougaku; Y Nagai; H Hashimoto; M Sakaguchi; N Handa; K Kitagawa; M Matsumoto; M Hori
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Common carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness: indicators of cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients. The SMART Study (Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease).

Authors:  P C Simons; A Algra; M L Bots; D E Grobbee; Y van der Graaf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Differential effects of an alpha 1-blocker (doxazosin) on diurnal blood pressure variation in dipper and non-dipper type hypertension.

Authors:  H Ebata; Y Hojo; U Ikeda; H Ishida; T Natsume; K Shimada
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound Doppler renal resistive index: a useful tool for the management of the hypertensive patient.

Authors:  Francesca Viazzi; Giovanna Leoncini; Lorenzo E Derchi; Roberto Pontremoli
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Comparison of renal arterial resistive index in type 2 diabetic nephropathy stage 0-4.

Authors:  Sharareh Sanei Sistani; Ali Alidadi; Alireza Ansari Moghadam; Fatemeh Mohamadnezhad; Bahareh Heshmat Ghahderijani
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2019-08-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.